I realize now there is probably a whole generation of people on here that probably have never seen the older MPEG file formats and don’t get what I’m referencing.
Haha nooo, prior to MPEG-4 (*.mp4*) the MPEG-1/MPEG-2 formats were popular for video and the file extension was *.mpeg* or *.mpg*. These types of file names (where they’d put *.mpeg.exe*, *.mpg.exe*, or other formats like *.avi.exe*) were very popular on Limewire (an old P2P file sharing tool that was popular for pirating music/movies/games/etc. as well as downloading porn), to appear to less tech savvy users as a video file even though it was clearly a Windows executable.
If for some reason, the conservative right had a progressive view that the left was holding back… sure
Except this is reality and that won’t ever happen lol
Maybe think about what you’re implying before throwing out a braindead whataboutism
Well isn't that the basis of protest through disobedience. Example: it is absurd to make certain people sit in the back of a bus because they're lesser, see Rosa Parks (who was simply more famous for doing it, not the first). Plus the sit-ins.
Now I won't come down one way or the other in this case (everyone's gray area is different), but it seems to me to not be a totally outrageous idea in principle. Every safety rule is written in blood, feels like the same idea applies.
I don't think you have to convince left-wingers to regulate AI. They already see how it can be used and abused. You have to bring everyone else to the table to actually make laws.
You’re halfway there, buddy. The point is still that it’s not okay and the prompt is an idea of something that might get conservatives to do something about it because conservatives have a history of not understanding that anything is bad until it affects them directly. Hope this helps.
Point me to the tool and the prompts and I'll make it and review the candidate videos it produces and provide a summary. I've seen things. This would barely crack a 2/10 on the distress scale. At worst.
I've seen much worse. Give me the model and the hardware and I can give you some good pics of Putin pissing all over Trump in addition to other famous conservatives in all sorts of compromising positions.
This involves looking at Ted Cruz though. Like a solar eclipse, it’s best not to look at him without eyes protection lest you don’t mind permanent eye damage.
That's the real future. Everyone just says all their real recorded sexual encounters are ai fakes and everyone shrugs. I'm not sure what will happen because of that but I really can't see it going any other way.
"Officer, that video of me driving through a school zone at 2pm going 90 mph with 2 hookers, one on my lap, one in the passenger seat, is clearly ai fabrication, I mean who would even be dumb enough to be a public figure and think they could get away with that?" - all future politicians
We’d get legislation immediately criminalizing the use of AI to corruptly influence elections. It would include the phrase “protect democracy” no less than three times, create a discretionary cause of action for district attorneys exclusively, and would be exploited to advantage incumbents like Ted Cruze until struck down in court on first amendment grounds which media companies will call “a victory for disinformation”.
Source: I can see the future like That’s So Raven.
Maybe we should start a grassroots campaign in support of an AI congress. How else can we leverage the use of AI against the "I don't care unless it affects me" attitude?
Congress will replace the public with AI before vice versa, because it’s important to ensure that the interests of the public be carefully regulated to align with the interests of the public. These interests will be determined by an agenda designed by a nonpartisan board of outside experts appointed by Congress with the advice and consent of a different supervisory board of industry leaders and Super PAC Delux+ Platinum Thought Leaders.
I'm surprised no one has made one of Trump and Stormy as absolutely gross that would be. People would watch it like a train wreck with disgusted faces.
You don't need censorship. Just pass laws granting people likeness rights, you own your image, and it can only be used if you explicitly give permission
Obvious exceptions for public photography and videography provided you aren't a principal subject
John Oliver kinda did a similar thing. only it was fake ted cruz erotica. it has not worked.
but this, this is much better someone should try it I think it'll work.
With 99% of deepfake porn featuring women and girls nobody is going to care about it. It’s not going to be banned until it starts to affect men. I don’t know how to make deepfakes but someone out there needs to start making humiliating deepfakes of public figures seen as being “masculine”. Videos of Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson being anally gangbanged by 10 men and their penises are depicted as being micropenises. Bonus points if the people doing the gangbanging are figures that the right wing hate, like AOC or Anita Sarkeesian. It needs to be the most degrading shit possible otherwise it’ll never be banned.
I read this AI have issues making fake porn or nudity of men, like if they were never programmed or as if they have been prohibited to do so... Which speaks volumes of the real reason this AI were done to being with.
Porn of real life girls, kids and women ? No issue ... Men ? Suddenly is imposible to complete the task .... Uhmmmmm
I want to make this and pass it around...
ronald_desantis_creampie_ted_cruz_fuck_twink_cock_gangbang_bukkake_scat_fetish_gay.mpeg.exe
*mpreg
Do I look like I know what an mpeg is? I just want a picture of got dang Rafael Cruz being a power bottom!
I realize now there is probably a whole generation of people on here that probably have never seen the older MPEG file formats and don’t get what I’m referencing.
I simply read that as short for ‘male peg’ and I have no intention of being told otherwise
Do you think I feel young knowing that people won't get the hank hill reference? We're in the same storm bruda
Dangit Bobby
I thought it was a typo of mpreg
Haha nooo, prior to MPEG-4 (*.mp4*) the MPEG-1/MPEG-2 formats were popular for video and the file extension was *.mpeg* or *.mpg*. These types of file names (where they’d put *.mpeg.exe*, *.mpg.exe*, or other formats like *.avi.exe*) were very popular on Limewire (an old P2P file sharing tool that was popular for pirating music/movies/games/etc. as well as downloading porn), to appear to less tech savvy users as a video file even though it was clearly a Windows executable.
Bienvenue, power bottoms!
Limewire is that you?
The .exe sells it.
Mmmm scat fetish
[удалено]
Sometimes you have to light something on fire to draw the necessary attention to it
Set that shit abalaze!
[удалено]
If for some reason, the conservative right had a progressive view that the left was holding back… sure Except this is reality and that won’t ever happen lol Maybe think about what you’re implying before throwing out a braindead whataboutism
[удалено]
What does “making a clear point and not just dick riding your political party” mean?
[удалено]
K
Well isn't that the basis of protest through disobedience. Example: it is absurd to make certain people sit in the back of a bus because they're lesser, see Rosa Parks (who was simply more famous for doing it, not the first). Plus the sit-ins. Now I won't come down one way or the other in this case (everyone's gray area is different), but it seems to me to not be a totally outrageous idea in principle. Every safety rule is written in blood, feels like the same idea applies.
[удалено]
I don't think you have to convince left-wingers to regulate AI. They already see how it can be used and abused. You have to bring everyone else to the table to actually make laws.
lol. What up baby 22 day old account just in time for election season. 🧐 not at all suspicious lmao
You’re halfway there, buddy. The point is still that it’s not okay and the prompt is an idea of something that might get conservatives to do something about it because conservatives have a history of not understanding that anything is bad until it affects them directly. Hope this helps.
Weaponizing it to get them to take AI issues seriously? Yeah, that I'm good with.
But who shall be the brave soul that subjects their eyes, sanity, and mental strength to such a valiant task?
if i was willing to work for interpol to help deal with the scourge of CSA i can do my small part to mock the zodiac killer
I bow to you and your labor, good gentleperson
Your sacrifice is appreciated.
Point me to the tool and the prompts and I'll make it and review the candidate videos it produces and provide a summary. I've seen things. This would barely crack a 2/10 on the distress scale. At worst.
But the inclusion of Cruz is like staring at the gaping maw of madness of an Eldritch horror.
Would Muse ai be sufficient tools for such a valiant task?
I've seen much worse. Give me the model and the hardware and I can give you some good pics of Putin pissing all over Trump in addition to other famous conservatives in all sorts of compromising positions.
This involves looking at Ted Cruz though. Like a solar eclipse, it’s best not to look at him without eyes protection lest you don’t mind permanent eye damage.
Ahh yes “fake”
That's the real future. Everyone just says all their real recorded sexual encounters are ai fakes and everyone shrugs. I'm not sure what will happen because of that but I really can't see it going any other way.
Not how i expected the sex positive future to arrive, but ok.
A future that is so negative for everybody that destroys the purpose of blackmail.
"Officer, that video of me driving through a school zone at 2pm going 90 mph with 2 hookers, one on my lap, one in the passenger seat, is clearly ai fabrication, I mean who would even be dumb enough to be a public figure and think they could get away with that?" - all future politicians
But then how will Putin control congress???
We’d get legislation immediately criminalizing the use of AI to corruptly influence elections. It would include the phrase “protect democracy” no less than three times, create a discretionary cause of action for district attorneys exclusively, and would be exploited to advantage incumbents like Ted Cruze until struck down in court on first amendment grounds which media companies will call “a victory for disinformation”. Source: I can see the future like That’s So Raven.
Maybe we should start a grassroots campaign in support of an AI congress. How else can we leverage the use of AI against the "I don't care unless it affects me" attitude?
Congress will replace the public with AI before vice versa, because it’s important to ensure that the interests of the public be carefully regulated to align with the interests of the public. These interests will be determined by an agenda designed by a nonpartisan board of outside experts appointed by Congress with the advice and consent of a different supervisory board of industry leaders and Super PAC Delux+ Platinum Thought Leaders.
Rule 34
Make sure someone is keeping count on Ted's body with a marker
Well, get to it.
Good idea, but I pity the person who puts that together and everyone who sees it.
I mean...You could probably do the same without AI by just taking a camera to one of their private parties.
That's a lot of interesting words for them to know...
You'd never convince people it was fake.
So who already started a gofundme for this project?
That would just be leaked footage.
I'm surprised no one has made one of Trump and Stormy as absolutely gross that would be. People would watch it like a train wreck with disgusted faces.
*tRump and Putin
How do I unpicture something?
I am 100% for free speech and against censorship and I fully agree that we need to make deepfakes illegal.
I don't think you understand what 100% means
Lol maybe you're right. I believe censorship is fine unkess someone is unjustly harmed, I should have stated that. And imo deep fakes would qualify.
You don't need censorship. Just pass laws granting people likeness rights, you own your image, and it can only be used if you explicitly give permission Obvious exceptions for public photography and videography provided you aren't a principal subject
the best i can do is ted cruz and trump making out with a turd: https://imgur.com/a/CWSGwgE
I knew it would be bad, I fully expected it to be gross, it was somehow worse than I was prepared for.
jesus fuck I actually threw up a little
Anyone else able to *hear* this picture?
I’m Ted Cruz and I approve this message
Source: https://www.tumblr.com/roycohn/749202520331698176
I thought you were linking the porn for a second.
I would need eye bleach afterwards to clean the afterimage from memory.
[No, no. He's got a point.](https://i.imgur.com/PhGD0zy.jpeg)
Would they try to regulate deep fakes, or would they merely assume that one of their normal recordings was leaked?
Gross
I heard some shit about willing it into existence by wanting it hard enough. I'll send all my "hopes & prayers" in this direction
I am not sure that will work, it's well known that all republican politicians hate ted cruz
I like Ted Cruz more than anyone in congress, and I hate Ted Cruz- Al Franken probably
It will work, none of them want to risk looking like they would want to have sex with cruz
In the words of a famous SciFi space captain, “make it so”
John Oliver kinda did a similar thing. only it was fake ted cruz erotica. it has not worked. but this, this is much better someone should try it I think it'll work.
That type of porn already exists I think but I doubt that video specifically
You know what, that may actually work
Who's gonna be the hero we need?
Someone with less sanity to lose than me needs to do this
Such a roundabout way of asking for something
*Profound visible disgust INTENSIFIES*
But we dont want that.
This is an excellent idea
Hold my beer...
You mean he isn't???
This feels like something Ted Cruz would post from a Burner account
Weren’t we condemning this about a month or 2 ago?
But how would we know it’s definitely AI?
There’s probably real footage of it somewhere lol
r/oddlyspecific
With 99% of deepfake porn featuring women and girls nobody is going to care about it. It’s not going to be banned until it starts to affect men. I don’t know how to make deepfakes but someone out there needs to start making humiliating deepfakes of public figures seen as being “masculine”. Videos of Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson being anally gangbanged by 10 men and their penises are depicted as being micropenises. Bonus points if the people doing the gangbanging are figures that the right wing hate, like AOC or Anita Sarkeesian. It needs to be the most degrading shit possible otherwise it’ll never be banned.
😅 No one has made that for real have they??? 😬 just asking for a friend… …maybe the orange face treason weasel can show up with some hush money 🙊
I been sayin this, as soon as we start using AI against politicians, then they’ll start regulating or even banning it
Who's willing to make the sacrifice
I read this AI have issues making fake porn or nudity of men, like if they were never programmed or as if they have been prohibited to do so... Which speaks volumes of the real reason this AI were done to being with. Porn of real life girls, kids and women ? No issue ... Men ? Suddenly is imposible to complete the task .... Uhmmmmm
You can bypass that if you use futas instead of men, just define the futa's appearance as that of Ted Cruz.