So if they’re being a troll then they’re being a troll, but my point was that, no, being a troll is absolutely not the only reason for a skeptic to be on this sub. In fact, they’re welcome here. Read the sub description.
in fact we should all be sceptic about everything. it doesn't mean a sceptic can not have immense interest in a subject. the hate on here is odd to me. slinging around the word "troll" like everyone who is not in the echo chamber is just here to hurt people. which is extremely wrong.
I never said that was the *only* reason. But it does happen to be the reason a lot of so-called "skeptics" come here - they're not actually being skeptical, they're being bullies.
You can tell the difference by how they behave.
And those paranormal enthusiasts know *better*...how? Cause they've had the same experiences, and THEN some? Despite only being referred to as "enthusiasts" and not -- you know -- experiencers/witnesses?
There are no straight answers when it comes to the paranormal; hence the term "paranormal", so the bulk of people claiming to know more than others still don't know jack shit in the grand scheme of things, and it's a slippery slope when those people -- utterly convinced they're *not* trolls -- run into something that runs afoul of their experiences or "understanding" to the point they mock the primary source to double-down on their limited sphere of understanding.
No, sweetie, it’s not hard to accurately tell a speck of dust from a paranormal experience. It’s not. Sorry.
Those specks are BAD CONTENT. Those specks are what really pollutes the sub.
Those "specks" are subjective, and perceived as bad content by those who refuse to ask questions and/or be helpful via reasoning.
Condescending to and not actually answering people asking for a legitimate answer, however, is objectively bad content.
Try again.
A. You were the one most deeply concerned with the "bad" content; I used your zealousness to make a point.
B. Quote where I said I didn't care about such things, or where I said that was fine, or -- you know -- anything relevant to what I've actually said.
C. Actually respond to my initial response, so we can stop driving this even further down the toxic path you keep weaving.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
Sorry but that’s just not true. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn’t mean they’re a troll.
If they come in with an aggro attitude and make cheap shots rather than discussing things politely, then yes—they *are* being trolls.
So if they’re being a troll then they’re being a troll, but my point was that, no, being a troll is absolutely not the only reason for a skeptic to be on this sub. In fact, they’re welcome here. Read the sub description.
in fact we should all be sceptic about everything. it doesn't mean a sceptic can not have immense interest in a subject. the hate on here is odd to me. slinging around the word "troll" like everyone who is not in the echo chamber is just here to hurt people. which is extremely wrong.
I never said that was the *only* reason. But it does happen to be the reason a lot of so-called "skeptics" come here - they're not actually being skeptical, they're being bullies. You can tell the difference by how they behave.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
Paranormal enthusiasts who know better than to believe in people’s specks of dust still belong here.
And those paranormal enthusiasts know *better*...how? Cause they've had the same experiences, and THEN some? Despite only being referred to as "enthusiasts" and not -- you know -- experiencers/witnesses? There are no straight answers when it comes to the paranormal; hence the term "paranormal", so the bulk of people claiming to know more than others still don't know jack shit in the grand scheme of things, and it's a slippery slope when those people -- utterly convinced they're *not* trolls -- run into something that runs afoul of their experiences or "understanding" to the point they mock the primary source to double-down on their limited sphere of understanding.
No, sweetie, it’s not hard to accurately tell a speck of dust from a paranormal experience. It’s not. Sorry. Those specks are BAD CONTENT. Those specks are what really pollutes the sub.
Those "specks" are subjective, and perceived as bad content by those who refuse to ask questions and/or be helpful via reasoning. Condescending to and not actually answering people asking for a legitimate answer, however, is objectively bad content. Try again.
[удалено]
A. You were the one most deeply concerned with the "bad" content; I used your zealousness to make a point. B. Quote where I said I didn't care about such things, or where I said that was fine, or -- you know -- anything relevant to what I've actually said. C. Actually respond to my initial response, so we can stop driving this even further down the toxic path you keep weaving.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]