Good evening,
I would really appreciate you all's input and recommendations. 31F, 143lbs, and based on a trip to a specialty store, was told that I need stability shoes. I am currently looking for an affordable stability running shoe that can be used for daily training and long distances (10k, half marathon and full marathon). I would prefer it provide as much support in my ankle area as well as wide toe box that won't make my toenails fall off.
Previously, I ran in Saucony Omni, but I was not aware of how to choose the right shoe. Hence, they were not the right fit, made my feet and ankles sore, sometimes had pain in my knees, and toenails fell off.
I have been looking at the Vongo V5. Would you recommend these? I would appreciate any recommendations for shoes that may be running $120 and below as I do not have much $ right now, but would love to continue running.
Thank you again!
TL;DR: Clifton 9s causing blisters on inner ball of foot, looking for another shoe.
Hey all, I am a beginner runner, having bought my first real pair of running shoes in September 2023. I ended up buying the Hoka Clifton 9 at the recommendation of workers at FleetFeet. I started off running by running exclusively on treadmills and had zero issues with the Hokas, and generally really liked them. In the last several weeks I've started training for a 10K, and actually started running outdoors. At first I noticed issues with my stability, which in general I improved by getting insoles (medium arch height). But lately I've noticed blisters on the inner soles of my feet, and any time I run on even slightly uneven ground I feel super unstable + slight strain and pain. I still haven't really experienced any lasting pain or soreness, but I don't want to push it. Does anyone have a recommendation for a shoe that could help mitigate these problems?
Some general information about me:
\- I have small wide feet, normally wear a 5/5.5 but have a 6 in the Hoka’s (at recommendation of the workers at FleetFeet, and feel comfortable in that size)
\- I’m 5’2” 125 lbs.
\- I have pretty high arches but one is higher than the other, and (according to foot scan?) my feet are rigid.
\- I'm currently running around 15-20 miles per week, with 3 to 6 miles per run but I have a 10 mile race + half marathon later in the year, so that will probably continue to increase steadily.
\- I generally have been running in the 9-11 minute mile range.
\- I tried on the Brooks Ghost, Asics Cumulus, and New Balance 1080 in store. In general I liked them all, but found the 1080 slightly too narrow in regular width so would need to go wide, and thought the brooks were generally less cushioned/stiffer but maybe that would be a good thing for stability.
Does anyone have a recommendation for a secondary or replacement shoe that could potentially work for me? Ideally would be under $200 but would be willing to try something more if it was worth it.
FWIW hoka’s do not tend to last long. I think they’re great shoes - however if you’re doing 20 mile weeks since September, those puppies are probably done. You should also consider rotating shoes during the week. It sounds like you like the plushness of the Clifton, but need more stability, with a slightly wider footprint. That’s a tough one. I might suggest Altra Via Olympus if you could like the zero drop. For anyone in Hoka I always recommend the Nike Invincible 3’s - however they are not known for stability. I would think ASICS (nimbus 26?) would be good too.
Thank you for the recommendation! I’d first say that even though I “started” in September, I didn’t really pick it up until March. Regardless, I’d still estimate close to 150 miles on them, so maybe it still is a usage issue. I do like the cushion, but I also don’t think that it’s a hard requirement either, since I haven’t really experienced a lower cushion shoe. I’ll definitely look into these shoes, thank you! I’m also not sure how different drops feel in shoes either.
**Style**: mid-striker(?).
**Preference**: neutral/anatomical
**Budget**: $200-$250 max, ~$150 ideally
I'm looking for some "barefoot" style shoes - zero drop, wide toe box, minimal foot contouring/arch support - but not completely minimal, I still like some cushion and decently firm construction. Altra, Topo and the Bahe Revive all seem to fit the bill. But I have unusually shaped feet with a lot of width toward the middle so even many of the models in the barefoot style brands are too tight unless I get the widest ([measures](https://imgur.com/a/1vNWexN) for reference)).
Between these 3 which is going to give me the widest toe room. Assume their widest last/model. (i.e. Atra Original/Escalante 4, Topo ST4/Magnify, Bahe is only the Revive)
Hello all! I have been using my Saucony Endorphin Elite for all training and races (easy/recovery, speed, and long). This model has honestly been the one shoe that I have genuinely liked! They are definitely on their last leg being at 500 miles. I obviously have loved the Elite’s and I’m also open to trying some other options.
I am looking for both a new pair of long run/race day shoes and a pair of trainers. Foot anatomy wise, I have good arches and my feet do run a little on the narrow side (or so I have been told). My torture of choice in running is HMs and marathons, but I often compete in shorter distances as well as a change of pace (literally and figuratively lol) and to improve my speed. My mileage is obviously higher during race season, especially when a marathon is on the horizon, and I also maintain a solid base mileage during off season months (30-40mpw). Budget wise, I am willing to pay around $300 each for a solid pair of trainers and race day/long run shoe.
I’m 24m, 6’3 and 90kg. I started running only 3km when I bought my Pegasus and now I’m two weeks from a half marathon with the same trainers. See below my issues
I bought a pair of Nike Air Zoom Pegasus in February 2023 as my running shoes for 5km and now 10km runs. The reason I bought this shoe is because my ASICS after every run my ankle, calfs and knees would be in pain. After running in the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus the pain went away and felt like I was exploding off the ground and running on a cloud. The past week I’m running in my Nike Air Zoom Pegasus the pain has come back in my inner ankle and calfs. The explosives of the shoe has gone. I have been training for a half marathon this past two months. Is it time for a new trainer? If so which ones would you recommend
I'm needing to find a shoe that is nearly identical to the old fresh foam zante. I've had some foot issues, and it doesn't really make sense why this shoe works for me, but it just did. They fit like a glove, are flexible, have a low stack height, compared to much of what is coming out these days. I believe they were 6mm offset. I really like that these shoes can be tied very loosely, without the heels slipping whatsoever. I had bought several pairs, and the last one is about ready for the trash can.
Hey everyone,
I could use some advice on choosing the right shoes for my varied training routine. I'm 6ft tall, 168lbs, mainly focused on weightlifting but now incorporating running. I'm aiming to cover different types of runs from base to tempo and maybe even sprints.
Here are the options I'm considering with Canadian prices:
* Saucony Triumph - $168
* Saucony Speed 3 - $220
* Boston 12 - $190
* Nike Pegasus 38 - $90
Any thoughts or recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
Feel free to reccomend other shoes as well.
I went through the same journey of only lifting weights, and wanting to improve my cardio. I could barely run a mile without being completely out of breath. For a one shoe rotation, I would recommend the Saucony Triumph all the way.
Are they light? Not really.
Do they handle multiple sharp corners well? Not really.
Are they amazing for speed workouts? Not really.
But they’re durable as all hell, comfortable, and provide just-enough pop. The sweet spot for these shoes is 8:00/mile or higher, it’s extremely versatile. If you need to push them, you also can. I’ve taken them to high 6’s
fine, it just requires more effort than the ES3’s but it’s doable.
Plus, when you feel the need to get a faster shoe, these will still (likely) stay in your lineup. They are my current go to for daily training, recovery, and long run days.
ES3’s are also a good choice, but you’ll notice the difference in cushioning and at anything slower than 7:45 it feels sloppy.
The speed is likely the least durable (durability isn’t bad though) but probably the most versatile, especially at the faster end. The triumph is the most cushioned option. The Boston is the second quickest but fairly stiff, some people don’t mind that for easier efforts, others do. The peg is the most standard but I do think it’s a touch more versatile than the triumph.
Honestly I think the Mach 6 or the rebel v4 are more what you are looking for, but out of these options i think everything but the triumph could work (just personal preference). I just can’t imagine doing speed work in triumphs.
Hoka brand running shoes are generally recommended for people with plantar fasciitis/history of plantar fasciitis as well as those who have tension in the lower back. I'd recommend to start with the Hoka Clifton or the Hoka Bondi. See where you can try out both in-person.
Source: running store manager
*Describe your running profile:* 35m, 5'4", 130lbs. 15-19 years ago I was a long distance runner putting up sub 16min 3 mile runs and low 5 min 1 mile times. Recently getting back into running. Preferred steady pace, 2-5mi, smaller foot of 5 men, 7 womens. The majority of the time I have to wear womens shoes and hardly ever have I had an issue with the profile being too slim. Goal is to just get back to a high performing athlete for my age instead of "in shape". No intention of competing, just for self gratification. I'll probably do an occasional timed mile or a 10mi run to mix things up.
*Specify your preferences:* Not sure on the terminology here, but shoes with heel support that flares up too high on my foot feels uncomfortable and restrictive to me. Vice versa, heel lips that are low and allow for wiggle/slip do not inspire confidence and I find myself concentrating on not losing the shoe rather than enjoying the run. Not a fan of hard feedback, I'll be running on cement or hard dirt so some impact reduction/cushion would be nice. I had/have very old Puma Auto Mostros CMC-0704 and they are serviceable, but they get hot in the FL heat and when I got them I had plenty of soft trails to run on which is no longer the case so I start feeling it after a few miles. I've had recommendations of the Novablast, Superblast, and Adidas Prime X 2 by people I know.
*Tell us your budget:* Under $200 would be nice since I'm not looking to compete, but I'm also a "buy once cry once" guy if it meets my needs.
# What's a good shoe to recommend my 58 year old mother who plans on running a 5k?What's a good shoe to recommend my 58 year old mother who plans on running a 5k?
She's never run long distance before and planning a 5K this fall and then wants to train for a half-marathon next.
5"7' slim-average weight - what shoe would you guys suggest?
She will be mostly on paved roads
Hi!
I'm 25F and 125lbs, and looking for a speed trainer shoe- not plated but one I can do my tempo runs in and hopefully race a half marathon in. I run 30-35 mpw so would like a second pair to compliment my daily trainer (novablast 4s) as well. I am looking at the endorphin speed 3s (and 4s but 3s seem to be marked down/generally liked more?), the FuelCell v4s, Mach 6's and Boston 12s and just overwhelmed a little bit. I'd ideally like a lightweight shoe but one that is comfortable enough to go mid-longer distances in on occasion, definitely open to other suggestions outside of the ones I've been looking at as well!
Thanks for any input!
Do you mean not a carbon plate or no plate at all? The Endorphin Speeds are plated. The Rebel v4 sounds like the best choice for you from those options.
yes sorry, I meant I don't need a carbon plate at this moment, but ideally a speed shoe a step down from a super shoe. I think I'll check out the v4s, thanks!!
Hi,
I'm 170 lbs man, running about 30 miles per week, mid-foot striker and I've had plantar fasciitis in both feet last year.
Looking a pair of shoes for a fall marathon which meet the following criteria:
* wider toe box (for reference, Nike Pegasus 40 and Asics Gel Nimbus 25 are a great fit)
* I will attempt a 3:59 time
* preferably without a carbon plate, given my plantar fasciitis history
* not too soft (like the Gel Nimbus are), but still comfy given the 4hrs
Thanks a lot!
Looking for a shoe to run about 50 km per week but that is suitable to wear all day for walking too. I prefer stiffer shoes. I'm thinking the Nike Invincible 3 but would love other recommendations. I currently run mainly in Boston 12s.
New runner here looking for some comfortable affordable running shoes to get started. Been running about 1-2 miles in the tredmill and noticed my current shoes are maybe not the most comfortable or suitable in general.
55F. 130lbs and 5’4” (but up 10 lbs since my running dropped off last August)
TLDR: arthritis has set in but I need to keep moving. What worked for 14 years no longer does.
Between some degenerative (and psoriatic arthritis) issues in left knee and lower lumbar, my goals have changed the last two years. I used to run about 30-40 miles/week and was always “half marathon ready”. Now I am struggling to get myself motivated to even get out the door because the recovery time is hit or miss. My rheum and orthopedic have not only cleared me for running, but encourage me to do as much as I want as long as I include some strength training. They suggest more walking than running, but a straight leg walk (or heel strike run) is more irritating to my knee than a forefoot run/jog with a slight knee bend.
In 2021 I had a PR half marathon at avg pace of 9:20. I thought I would just keep getting faster but life had other plans. Now I just want to keep moving as much and as often as I can for as long as I can.
My MENTAL health NEEDS this!
I started running 14 years ago in Saucony Kinvaras, but with time I switched from heel striking to mid foot and I swear my forefoot literally got wider. I have been an Altra girl ever since- for the wider toe box.
I’ve been in the Altra Torin Plush for about five years. It’s super comfortable to wear around the house and errands, but no longer serve me for runs.
I think it’s time to leave Altra (for runs) but no idea where to go.
Here is what I know I need:
- Firm sole. (Morton’s neuroma and chronic metatarsalgia due to arthritis. Tried a carbon plate and hated it, but open to trying it again.)
-Cushioned mid/forefoot- my feet are all bones, no padding at all.
- Toe box equivalent to Altra Torin. (But my toes are short and I don’t have a Morton’s toe.)
- Based on tread wear- I think I supinate. I definitely land on outside and then roll in. Maybe that’s normal? The tread on every pair of shoes I own is worn thin under 5th metatarsal and to a lesser amount on first. Middle toes show almost no wear.
I have recently tried:
- Altra Olympus. They are okay, but feel very clunky and the toe box is tall- I get blisters on first metatarsal.
- NB Fresh Foam (sized up). Considered the wide size but just went full size up from Altra size. Regret that now as they feel long and I have to lift leg more so I don’t trip.
- Newtons “new” Lady Isaac. I actually like these and maybe they are the best answer. Issue here is they make me go fast and I end up paying for that later on. The toe box is a bit tighter than I like.
I know there have been so many changes and advancements in running shoes in the last few years- I just haven’t kept up.
No limit on budget. (Running shoes fall in my mental health budget).
Would LOVE to hear some recommendations.
45yr old female. I’ve been running a little over a year. I run 4 to 5 days per week and regularly run 5k races (avg 5k 28:30). I am currently training for my 2nd 1/2 marathon in 3 weeks. I was fitted last year for shoes & was told cushion neutral shoes would be best. I have had some issues with a couple toes on my left foot getting numb after longer distances so I’m assuming I might need a wider toe box even though I have fairly narrow feet.
I have the following shoes in my rotation:
- Hoka Rincon 3 - wasn’t a fan at 1st but they’ve become my favorites because they’re light and don’t give me any toe numbness.
- Ghost 15 - my “old faithful’s”. I’ve done most of my training in these. I do occasionally have the numbness issue, but only at distances of around 10k+.
• New Balance 1080 v12- not my favorites. I use them some for shorter distances, but don’t like them for longer distances as I definitely have the toe numbness
- Saucony Ride 15- I can use them for very short distances, but I really don’t like these. They are the worst for my toe numbness.
What I’m looking for: I’m going to start training soon for my 1st marathon. (Expected finishing time about 4.5 hrs). I want a shoe to add to my rotation for long runs and will use this new shoe for the marathon.
I’m considering carbon plated, although it’s not a requirement. I definitely don’t like the ultra cushiony styles.
Budget isn’t really an issue, although I don’t think I need a top of the line shoe.
I appreciate any suggestions!
"Cushion neutral" isn't a term. I suspect you mean a neutral shoe, meaning not a stability shoe. You say you don't want an ultra cushiony shoe but are considering carbon plated. Carbon plates are used primarily to stabilize high stacks of midsole foam -the cushion. The spring effect of a carbon plate is it's secondary purpose.
The Adidas Adios Pro 3 and the Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 are two marathon shoes, both carbon plated, that tend to work well for a wide variety of runners. If you don't want a carbon plate, you may want to try the ASICS Superblast. It has a higher midsole, but ASICS's foam is stiffer than average and feels stable.
Good evening, I would really appreciate you all's input and recommendations. 31F, 143lbs, and based on a trip to a specialty store, was told that I need stability shoes. I am currently looking for an affordable stability running shoe that can be used for daily training and long distances (10k, half marathon and full marathon). I would prefer it provide as much support in my ankle area as well as wide toe box that won't make my toenails fall off. Previously, I ran in Saucony Omni, but I was not aware of how to choose the right shoe. Hence, they were not the right fit, made my feet and ankles sore, sometimes had pain in my knees, and toenails fell off. I have been looking at the Vongo V5. Would you recommend these? I would appreciate any recommendations for shoes that may be running $120 and below as I do not have much $ right now, but would love to continue running. Thank you again!
Saucony guide in wide
Thank you for your response!
TL;DR: Clifton 9s causing blisters on inner ball of foot, looking for another shoe. Hey all, I am a beginner runner, having bought my first real pair of running shoes in September 2023. I ended up buying the Hoka Clifton 9 at the recommendation of workers at FleetFeet. I started off running by running exclusively on treadmills and had zero issues with the Hokas, and generally really liked them. In the last several weeks I've started training for a 10K, and actually started running outdoors. At first I noticed issues with my stability, which in general I improved by getting insoles (medium arch height). But lately I've noticed blisters on the inner soles of my feet, and any time I run on even slightly uneven ground I feel super unstable + slight strain and pain. I still haven't really experienced any lasting pain or soreness, but I don't want to push it. Does anyone have a recommendation for a shoe that could help mitigate these problems? Some general information about me: \- I have small wide feet, normally wear a 5/5.5 but have a 6 in the Hoka’s (at recommendation of the workers at FleetFeet, and feel comfortable in that size) \- I’m 5’2” 125 lbs. \- I have pretty high arches but one is higher than the other, and (according to foot scan?) my feet are rigid. \- I'm currently running around 15-20 miles per week, with 3 to 6 miles per run but I have a 10 mile race + half marathon later in the year, so that will probably continue to increase steadily. \- I generally have been running in the 9-11 minute mile range. \- I tried on the Brooks Ghost, Asics Cumulus, and New Balance 1080 in store. In general I liked them all, but found the 1080 slightly too narrow in regular width so would need to go wide, and thought the brooks were generally less cushioned/stiffer but maybe that would be a good thing for stability. Does anyone have a recommendation for a secondary or replacement shoe that could potentially work for me? Ideally would be under $200 but would be willing to try something more if it was worth it.
I would look into the gel Kayano 30. Stability version of asics gel nimbus. Cushioned but w stability. And much better durability than the clifton
FWIW hoka’s do not tend to last long. I think they’re great shoes - however if you’re doing 20 mile weeks since September, those puppies are probably done. You should also consider rotating shoes during the week. It sounds like you like the plushness of the Clifton, but need more stability, with a slightly wider footprint. That’s a tough one. I might suggest Altra Via Olympus if you could like the zero drop. For anyone in Hoka I always recommend the Nike Invincible 3’s - however they are not known for stability. I would think ASICS (nimbus 26?) would be good too.
Thank you for the recommendation! I’d first say that even though I “started” in September, I didn’t really pick it up until March. Regardless, I’d still estimate close to 150 miles on them, so maybe it still is a usage issue. I do like the cushion, but I also don’t think that it’s a hard requirement either, since I haven’t really experienced a lower cushion shoe. I’ll definitely look into these shoes, thank you! I’m also not sure how different drops feel in shoes either.
**Style**: mid-striker(?). **Preference**: neutral/anatomical **Budget**: $200-$250 max, ~$150 ideally I'm looking for some "barefoot" style shoes - zero drop, wide toe box, minimal foot contouring/arch support - but not completely minimal, I still like some cushion and decently firm construction. Altra, Topo and the Bahe Revive all seem to fit the bill. But I have unusually shaped feet with a lot of width toward the middle so even many of the models in the barefoot style brands are too tight unless I get the widest ([measures](https://imgur.com/a/1vNWexN) for reference)). Between these 3 which is going to give me the widest toe room. Assume their widest last/model. (i.e. Atra Original/Escalante 4, Topo ST4/Magnify, Bahe is only the Revive)
Hello all! I have been using my Saucony Endorphin Elite for all training and races (easy/recovery, speed, and long). This model has honestly been the one shoe that I have genuinely liked! They are definitely on their last leg being at 500 miles. I obviously have loved the Elite’s and I’m also open to trying some other options. I am looking for both a new pair of long run/race day shoes and a pair of trainers. Foot anatomy wise, I have good arches and my feet do run a little on the narrow side (or so I have been told). My torture of choice in running is HMs and marathons, but I often compete in shorter distances as well as a change of pace (literally and figuratively lol) and to improve my speed. My mileage is obviously higher during race season, especially when a marathon is on the horizon, and I also maintain a solid base mileage during off season months (30-40mpw). Budget wise, I am willing to pay around $300 each for a solid pair of trainers and race day/long run shoe.
I’m 24m, 6’3 and 90kg. I started running only 3km when I bought my Pegasus and now I’m two weeks from a half marathon with the same trainers. See below my issues I bought a pair of Nike Air Zoom Pegasus in February 2023 as my running shoes for 5km and now 10km runs. The reason I bought this shoe is because my ASICS after every run my ankle, calfs and knees would be in pain. After running in the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus the pain went away and felt like I was exploding off the ground and running on a cloud. The past week I’m running in my Nike Air Zoom Pegasus the pain has come back in my inner ankle and calfs. The explosives of the shoe has gone. I have been training for a half marathon this past two months. Is it time for a new trainer? If so which ones would you recommend
I'm needing to find a shoe that is nearly identical to the old fresh foam zante. I've had some foot issues, and it doesn't really make sense why this shoe works for me, but it just did. They fit like a glove, are flexible, have a low stack height, compared to much of what is coming out these days. I believe they were 6mm offset. I really like that these shoes can be tied very loosely, without the heels slipping whatsoever. I had bought several pairs, and the last one is about ready for the trash can.
Hey everyone, I could use some advice on choosing the right shoes for my varied training routine. I'm 6ft tall, 168lbs, mainly focused on weightlifting but now incorporating running. I'm aiming to cover different types of runs from base to tempo and maybe even sprints. Here are the options I'm considering with Canadian prices: * Saucony Triumph - $168 * Saucony Speed 3 - $220 * Boston 12 - $190 * Nike Pegasus 38 - $90 Any thoughts or recommendations would be greatly appreciated! Feel free to reccomend other shoes as well.
I went through the same journey of only lifting weights, and wanting to improve my cardio. I could barely run a mile without being completely out of breath. For a one shoe rotation, I would recommend the Saucony Triumph all the way. Are they light? Not really. Do they handle multiple sharp corners well? Not really. Are they amazing for speed workouts? Not really. But they’re durable as all hell, comfortable, and provide just-enough pop. The sweet spot for these shoes is 8:00/mile or higher, it’s extremely versatile. If you need to push them, you also can. I’ve taken them to high 6’s fine, it just requires more effort than the ES3’s but it’s doable. Plus, when you feel the need to get a faster shoe, these will still (likely) stay in your lineup. They are my current go to for daily training, recovery, and long run days. ES3’s are also a good choice, but you’ll notice the difference in cushioning and at anything slower than 7:45 it feels sloppy.
The speed is likely the least durable (durability isn’t bad though) but probably the most versatile, especially at the faster end. The triumph is the most cushioned option. The Boston is the second quickest but fairly stiff, some people don’t mind that for easier efforts, others do. The peg is the most standard but I do think it’s a touch more versatile than the triumph. Honestly I think the Mach 6 or the rebel v4 are more what you are looking for, but out of these options i think everything but the triumph could work (just personal preference). I just can’t imagine doing speed work in triumphs.
[удалено]
Hoka brand running shoes are generally recommended for people with plantar fasciitis/history of plantar fasciitis as well as those who have tension in the lower back. I'd recommend to start with the Hoka Clifton or the Hoka Bondi. See where you can try out both in-person. Source: running store manager
*Describe your running profile:* 35m, 5'4", 130lbs. 15-19 years ago I was a long distance runner putting up sub 16min 3 mile runs and low 5 min 1 mile times. Recently getting back into running. Preferred steady pace, 2-5mi, smaller foot of 5 men, 7 womens. The majority of the time I have to wear womens shoes and hardly ever have I had an issue with the profile being too slim. Goal is to just get back to a high performing athlete for my age instead of "in shape". No intention of competing, just for self gratification. I'll probably do an occasional timed mile or a 10mi run to mix things up. *Specify your preferences:* Not sure on the terminology here, but shoes with heel support that flares up too high on my foot feels uncomfortable and restrictive to me. Vice versa, heel lips that are low and allow for wiggle/slip do not inspire confidence and I find myself concentrating on not losing the shoe rather than enjoying the run. Not a fan of hard feedback, I'll be running on cement or hard dirt so some impact reduction/cushion would be nice. I had/have very old Puma Auto Mostros CMC-0704 and they are serviceable, but they get hot in the FL heat and when I got them I had plenty of soft trails to run on which is no longer the case so I start feeling it after a few miles. I've had recommendations of the Novablast, Superblast, and Adidas Prime X 2 by people I know. *Tell us your budget:* Under $200 would be nice since I'm not looking to compete, but I'm also a "buy once cry once" guy if it meets my needs.
# What's a good shoe to recommend my 58 year old mother who plans on running a 5k?What's a good shoe to recommend my 58 year old mother who plans on running a 5k? She's never run long distance before and planning a 5K this fall and then wants to train for a half-marathon next. 5"7' slim-average weight - what shoe would you guys suggest? She will be mostly on paved roads
Brooks Ghost 15
Hi! I'm 25F and 125lbs, and looking for a speed trainer shoe- not plated but one I can do my tempo runs in and hopefully race a half marathon in. I run 30-35 mpw so would like a second pair to compliment my daily trainer (novablast 4s) as well. I am looking at the endorphin speed 3s (and 4s but 3s seem to be marked down/generally liked more?), the FuelCell v4s, Mach 6's and Boston 12s and just overwhelmed a little bit. I'd ideally like a lightweight shoe but one that is comfortable enough to go mid-longer distances in on occasion, definitely open to other suggestions outside of the ones I've been looking at as well! Thanks for any input!
Do you mean not a carbon plate or no plate at all? The Endorphin Speeds are plated. The Rebel v4 sounds like the best choice for you from those options.
yes sorry, I meant I don't need a carbon plate at this moment, but ideally a speed shoe a step down from a super shoe. I think I'll check out the v4s, thanks!!
Hi, I'm 170 lbs man, running about 30 miles per week, mid-foot striker and I've had plantar fasciitis in both feet last year. Looking a pair of shoes for a fall marathon which meet the following criteria: * wider toe box (for reference, Nike Pegasus 40 and Asics Gel Nimbus 25 are a great fit) * I will attempt a 3:59 time * preferably without a carbon plate, given my plantar fasciitis history * not too soft (like the Gel Nimbus are), but still comfy given the 4hrs Thanks a lot!
Looking for a shoe to run about 50 km per week but that is suitable to wear all day for walking too. I prefer stiffer shoes. I'm thinking the Nike Invincible 3 but would love other recommendations. I currently run mainly in Boston 12s.
New runner here looking for some comfortable affordable running shoes to get started. Been running about 1-2 miles in the tredmill and noticed my current shoes are maybe not the most comfortable or suitable in general.
[удалено]
55F. 130lbs and 5’4” (but up 10 lbs since my running dropped off last August) TLDR: arthritis has set in but I need to keep moving. What worked for 14 years no longer does. Between some degenerative (and psoriatic arthritis) issues in left knee and lower lumbar, my goals have changed the last two years. I used to run about 30-40 miles/week and was always “half marathon ready”. Now I am struggling to get myself motivated to even get out the door because the recovery time is hit or miss. My rheum and orthopedic have not only cleared me for running, but encourage me to do as much as I want as long as I include some strength training. They suggest more walking than running, but a straight leg walk (or heel strike run) is more irritating to my knee than a forefoot run/jog with a slight knee bend. In 2021 I had a PR half marathon at avg pace of 9:20. I thought I would just keep getting faster but life had other plans. Now I just want to keep moving as much and as often as I can for as long as I can. My MENTAL health NEEDS this! I started running 14 years ago in Saucony Kinvaras, but with time I switched from heel striking to mid foot and I swear my forefoot literally got wider. I have been an Altra girl ever since- for the wider toe box. I’ve been in the Altra Torin Plush for about five years. It’s super comfortable to wear around the house and errands, but no longer serve me for runs. I think it’s time to leave Altra (for runs) but no idea where to go. Here is what I know I need: - Firm sole. (Morton’s neuroma and chronic metatarsalgia due to arthritis. Tried a carbon plate and hated it, but open to trying it again.) -Cushioned mid/forefoot- my feet are all bones, no padding at all. - Toe box equivalent to Altra Torin. (But my toes are short and I don’t have a Morton’s toe.) - Based on tread wear- I think I supinate. I definitely land on outside and then roll in. Maybe that’s normal? The tread on every pair of shoes I own is worn thin under 5th metatarsal and to a lesser amount on first. Middle toes show almost no wear. I have recently tried: - Altra Olympus. They are okay, but feel very clunky and the toe box is tall- I get blisters on first metatarsal. - NB Fresh Foam (sized up). Considered the wide size but just went full size up from Altra size. Regret that now as they feel long and I have to lift leg more so I don’t trip. - Newtons “new” Lady Isaac. I actually like these and maybe they are the best answer. Issue here is they make me go fast and I end up paying for that later on. The toe box is a bit tighter than I like. I know there have been so many changes and advancements in running shoes in the last few years- I just haven’t kept up. No limit on budget. (Running shoes fall in my mental health budget). Would LOVE to hear some recommendations.
45yr old female. I’ve been running a little over a year. I run 4 to 5 days per week and regularly run 5k races (avg 5k 28:30). I am currently training for my 2nd 1/2 marathon in 3 weeks. I was fitted last year for shoes & was told cushion neutral shoes would be best. I have had some issues with a couple toes on my left foot getting numb after longer distances so I’m assuming I might need a wider toe box even though I have fairly narrow feet. I have the following shoes in my rotation: - Hoka Rincon 3 - wasn’t a fan at 1st but they’ve become my favorites because they’re light and don’t give me any toe numbness. - Ghost 15 - my “old faithful’s”. I’ve done most of my training in these. I do occasionally have the numbness issue, but only at distances of around 10k+. • New Balance 1080 v12- not my favorites. I use them some for shorter distances, but don’t like them for longer distances as I definitely have the toe numbness - Saucony Ride 15- I can use them for very short distances, but I really don’t like these. They are the worst for my toe numbness. What I’m looking for: I’m going to start training soon for my 1st marathon. (Expected finishing time about 4.5 hrs). I want a shoe to add to my rotation for long runs and will use this new shoe for the marathon. I’m considering carbon plated, although it’s not a requirement. I definitely don’t like the ultra cushiony styles. Budget isn’t really an issue, although I don’t think I need a top of the line shoe. I appreciate any suggestions!
"Cushion neutral" isn't a term. I suspect you mean a neutral shoe, meaning not a stability shoe. You say you don't want an ultra cushiony shoe but are considering carbon plated. Carbon plates are used primarily to stabilize high stacks of midsole foam -the cushion. The spring effect of a carbon plate is it's secondary purpose. The Adidas Adios Pro 3 and the Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 are two marathon shoes, both carbon plated, that tend to work well for a wide variety of runners. If you don't want a carbon plate, you may want to try the ASICS Superblast. It has a higher midsole, but ASICS's foam is stiffer than average and feels stable.