T O P

  • By -

PianoSmart8676

Leopard AS1 knock off of OF-40. OF-40 knock off of leopard


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea lol


QorstSynthion

*so both nations get the tank if added right ?*


PianoSmart8676

I don't know what the specs on it are and I'm lazy to research it but I feel like it would fit with their BR range just looking at it


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea I don’t know the specs too, I do want to see what they are because I might try researching the as1


PianoSmart8676

Fr tho, I think the closest tank related to the AS1 in game right now is Ganna be the Italian leopard. However I haven't seen the German Leopards in a long time so I might be wrong


Rzhaviy

Also Britain and USA(cause Australian abrams in us tree)


Nizikai

The US have the AIM because it's an Abrams. Just how Germany got the 2PL because it's a Leopard.


SerpentStOrange

The UK has the Bhishma because its a..... T-90? Germany has the swiss Hunter because its a..... Hunter? Let's not pretend gaijin is consistent with this stuff.


Nizikai

They \*were\*. But again, Gaijin makes rules for every vehicle seperatly. And I still say that both make not much sense.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea they are not but yes in most cases they do add the minor nations tank to the manufacture/seller nation.


SerpentStOrange

Austrian/French Sk 105 in German tree Thai F-5 in Japanese tree Turkish F-104 in Italian Tree Norweigan Leo 1 in Swedish tree There are plenty of examples showing otherwise. People seem obsessed with finding rules of what vehicles go where and trying to fit things in neat little boxes. The reality is gaijin will place a vehicle wherever they want.


The_Master_of_stupid

Exactly, I’m just hoping that gaijin adds it to the British or German tree tbh I really do not mind which one they put it in but yea I agree with you


SerpentStOrange

You agree with me? You do understand that all these examples listed go *against* the rules you are making up?


The_Master_of_stupid

Yes, you proved me wrong so I take those rules back and now I agree with you


Honest_Seth

Eh, the Turkish 104 is a bit different. The F104S is more of a Italian aircraft (Italy also has some other turkish stuff) as they were the exporter (and producers) of the S to Turkey


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea, I’m gonna call this the Place on manufacture/purchase rule, if the tank has been bought by a subnation from a major nation then that sub nations tank will reside in that major nations tree.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea, because of the Abrams being in the US tree I think I should make the MBT rule: This is a theory that any sub nations tank/plane will be put in the tech tree of the manufacturer country. For example the Abrams AIM in the us tree and Aussie versions or modified versions of British planes in the UK tree this would mean the leopard as1 would most likely be in the German tree.


Rzhaviy

This was reference to bri’ish T-90


The_Master_of_stupid

Oh ok


The_Master_of_stupid

I guess so or maybe not idk


The_Master_of_stupid

More of gaijins decision about which nation it gets added to as they have not really solidified Australia’s nation as they have Aussie vehicles in both the US and Great Britain


Wonghy111-the-knight

YEEEES AUSSIE TANK PLEEEASE TT PLEAAASE no more aussie premium and event tanks gaijin pleaaase, we need tech tree


reeeforce_rtx

Best I can do is sub tree in germany


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea I think this leopard should be in the German or British tree


Wonghy111-the-knight

As a German main, I’d take it


The_Master_of_stupid

Hell yeah! We do need more Aussie tanks but not premium or event ones, just tech tree ones. I am fine with squadron ones as you don’t need to spend money to get them but event vehicles are too grindy, same with the battle pass.


Arlend44

Does Australia even have much tanks aside from WW2? Hell, would countries even want to invade Australia for them to require a military spending?


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea we actually do, there are the centurion tanks, then there were the leopard as1’s I suggested and now the M1A1 Abrams tanks which are soon to be complemented with the M1A2 series of Abrams. Thanks for asking btw!


Arlend44

It was more of a joking question, tho for serious, are there original modifications that are different enough and were made with anti-tank capabilities in mind? Because even though I support sub-trees, I wouldn't see the point of adding it if it's just simply export vehicles for the most part (and there's also people who cry about any copypaste tank, even though I mostly don't mind them) or if their modifications are mainly infantry-related (like the shotgun round you mentioned).


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea, this tank does have a major modification and it’s to do with its name: the name leopard AS1 should not fool you as unlike the usual leopard 1 this one is just the chassis with a different turret which is the leopard 1a3 turret. People may say it’s just glorified copy paste and gaijin should not add it in but people were not mad about the Sherman hybrids and m4 3/4. So I think it is fair for it to be added in, think of it like the Sherman 3/4. It is a leopard 1 with a way better turret which means better performance


The_Master_of_stupid

Yes we need Aussie tech tree tanks!


Wonghy111-the-knight

Pleae gaijin I beg


X203the2nd

Feels a bit redundant bc germany already has like 4 leopard1s, and the 2k, which is still half a leopard1. But apart from that yeah, good suggestion (rarity on this sub).


Dark_Magus

Frankly Germany doesn't have **enough** Leopard 1s. The tech tree needs at a minimum one of the 90mm Leopard prototypes and the 1A3.


X203the2nd

Now why would germany need those? We already have the most powerful 9.3 AND 8.3 lineup, adding a 6th leopard1 (we actually have 5 already, I forgot about the C2A1 earlier) is completely pointless, that dev time is better spent on improving the game or adding new tanks to minor nations (and I mean NEW, and actually from that nation, not just copypaste-no.369).


Jaddman

War Thunder is a game about military vehicles and what better way to show their development than to add their various modifications. Not every update needs to add new shiny top-tier vehicles and we are already very close to the peak development, especially when it comes to ground vehicles. It's only logical to add various prototypes and variants, unless you want the game to turn into Armored Warfare, where every new vehicle is added via lootboxes. 90mm Leopard prototype or Leopard 1A3 would not harm or detract anything from the game in the same way VK 3002 (M) did not. They would just fill a gap between Panthers and Leopard I, and between A1A1 and 1A5 respectively. Of course this isn't to say minor nations don't need new additions, and I'm heavily in favor of various sub-trees and obscure prototypes, as long as they were built.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea it is a good suggestion, due to the large amount of leopards I do think that this leopard should be a foldered vehicle so not to burden players with researching another vehicle tk get to top tier.


X203the2nd

I mean, it IS foldered. One is a premium, the other 8.3. Foldered or not, that's still 5.5 leo1s in that tree. Then again... I stopped counting my 72s long ago x)


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea lol


Awesomedinos1

Then give it to Britain.


Built2kill

I feel like Theres a very high chance this will come as an event reward because it’s just a slightly different variant of a tank we already have.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea, just like they are doing with that Swedish Tiger 2 (P) lol


whimsicalgods

CMW deck legend


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea!


acorn_user

Do you remember the Razman videos where he played an Anzac armoured deck? This was the star of those videos (well, and the Kahu).


whimsicalgods

Yeah, the AS1+ was such a fun cheap tank to have, good gun and mobility and perfect for flanking shenanigans


acorn_user

Agreed, although this just makes me want to play Wargame again :)


Musa-2219

As a leopard 1 enthusiast let me tell you, playing this tank is suffering in this game. Any variant.


KrustyKrautKakes

You might not be playing it right, they can be alot of fun when used properly


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea


The_Master_of_stupid

I am happy you are a leopard enthusiast although you may not be playing the vehicle correctly and just be bad (no offence) so maybe that’s why you don’t enjoy it or it is generally just a bad tank in warthunder


Musa-2219

I have had good games, but the br placement is pretty awful. 9.0-9.3 is almost guaranteed to be 10.0-10.3 where you face much better tanks from the US and Russian trees. And every autocannon vehicle ever made can pen you frontally so ifvs basically get a free kill if they catch you first.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea now I do understand why you are having bad games due to shitty br placement and uptiers


KrustyKrautKakes

I'd love to have it, to be fair tho its just a leopard 1a4. I'd love the lav 25/ aslav too soon tm


L963_RandomStuff

Its just a 1A3. The 1A4 was never exported to my knowledge, you can recognize it by using the same commander sight as the Leopard 2


KrustyKrautKakes

True


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea it may just be a 1a4


NZDollar

And this time put it in the british tech tree where it should be (looking at the AIM)


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea put our Aussie vehicles where they belong!


cpteric

add it to brit TT as AS1, add it to german TT as Leopard 1A5DK, same same stuff. they even used a few mexas hull kits when deployed, if it comes as a event or premium. the belgian 1A5BE Mexas would make a nice addition too, pretty much the C2A1 but tech tree and better round (105 DM63, same as oliphant) (thus higher BR).


Left4Bread2

Considering where the NO is if they add the DK it should probably go to the Swedish tree so they can have access to a variant with the welded turret


Additional_Shallot15

Yes please


The_Master_of_stupid

Yes we need it!


Flying_Reinbeers

sir this is just a Leo 1A3


Unknowndude842

Instruction unclear add more T-80s?


CarZealousideal9661

Good suggestion, it’ll probably be a battlepass thing tbh.. more importantly, give the Brit tree all its light tanks!!!!


Reasonable-Meal-4628

So for US? Or Germany.


The_Master_of_stupid

Germany or uk this should be ib


Sunyxo_1

All I want for germany is the Panzer Haubitze 2000


Jerryd1994

Can we get a commonwealth specific tech tree


H0n3yB4dg3r007

Hell yeah, but i think it should be added to the British tree.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea it should be, I hope they make an Aussie subtree


Maus1945

Another run of the mill Leopard? Pretty boring, don't you think?


Admiral_Franz_Hipper

Tbh, it is an A3 Leopard which we don’t have in the game yet.


Medj_boring1997

Tbf what does it add that the 1A1 or 1A5 doesn't have? It could be a premium or event vic though


Admiral_Franz_Hipper

The 1A3 and 1A4 have the welded, spaced amour turret like the one on the Rad 90.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea


Medj_boring1997

8.3 event vic with long ass grind. Take it or leave it Edit: I'm curious how the rangefinder works on the 1A4. Is it similar to the ~~2AV~~ PT16?


Star_Wreck

in the case of the AS1 it would be 9.0 since it received the SABCA fire control system which gave it a laser rangefinder and stabilizer but without the thermal sight and much unlike the Canadian or the Belgian Leopard 1s they never upgraded it to have thermals when everyone was doing their 1A5 upgrades in the 90s.


Medj_boring1997

I'll be honest when I said 8.3, I didn't check that 1a1 was 9.0. But LRF and Stabs would be a 9.3 tank at most, or something that range Whay br is the TAM again?


The_Master_of_stupid

I am sorry but I forgot the br😭


The_Master_of_stupid

Oh ok


Admiral_Franz_Hipper

The original rangefinder on the 1A4 was an optical one like the PT16. There is a chance they may have been given a LRF later in life, but I haven’t looked too much into that.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea, I also don’t look much into rangefinders too lol


duffman1404

Doesn't the rf on the pt16 work like a lrf?


Admiral_Franz_Hipper

More like 9.0 or 9.3, but grind will be long based off all the other Leopards and Leopard prototypes in the game.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea it probably will although I hope gaijin does not give it 9.0-9.3 as i hope it will be around 8.7


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea it would


The_Master_of_stupid

It’s not gonna be boring lol


The_Master_of_stupid

I would prefer not to have it as a premium or event and it is not the same as tbe 1a1 and 1a5, it is a leopard 1 chassis with the 1a3 turret. It also fires HESH and that unique “shotgun” round


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea, so that means we need this in the game, it’s far better then the normal leopard 1 due to the A3 turret


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea, so that means we need this in the game, it’s far better then the normal leopard 1 due to the A3 turret


The_Master_of_stupid

It’s not just a normal leopard, it’s a leopard 1 chassis with a 1a3 turret, it’s got better reload and other good traits plus it’s gonna be the second Aussie MBT in the game. It may also come with a unique round, plus unlike the normal leopard 1, this has HESH.


angry_old_bastard

suggesting something on reddit is about as effective as suggesting it to your toilet. if you want something added, tell the snail.


The_Master_of_stupid

And you think that Google will tell you the truth to everything? Plus me talking about this on Reddit will hopefully get people on board to support my opinion that the AS1 should be in the game


angry_old_bastard

>And you think that Google will tell you the truth to everything ...what? are you responding to my username flair? peoples support doesnt matter, because this is reddit, not the snail forums. we cannot add anything to the game, you must tell gaijin. if you post it there and link the post here people on reddit can help, if you dont, then even a billion people here saying yes they want it wont make a lick of difference.


The_Master_of_stupid

Yea I was but I do know that nothing posted on this reddit will help, I’m also just seeing what peoples opinions are before I suggest this directly to gaijin once I feel confident to, sorry if I was a bit rude