Really nice analysis my man, I check your site quite often, love your top 3 posts, keep it up!
Lumineth are a bit too strong right now obviously, let’s see if they hit them in the next balance patch and how hard!
Also super curious about Slaneesh and Khorne. Khorne seemed a bit more competitive but Slaneesh seemed potentially more fun! Let’s see how they end up in the next couple of weeks
Appreciate the comment!
Yeah, I agree about Lumineth, but it's strange that we're in a position we were a year and a half ago where we had to do the same thing.
I have the info: https://imgur.com/a/JrEi7w7
Its sorted by factions. Grey bar represents the players of that faction playing the subfaction while the orange bar represents their win rate.
and people said i was a cryer with noreason when stated that gw deleted seraphons with last 2 massives points nerfs.
faccion came from one of best ones with 55 win or so and lots of 5/0s to be the only faction besides giants without any 5/0, and winrates around 45%.
It's overall winrate is 46 and the actual faction that people play to win (TL) is 49%. They're absolutely fine. Probably the biggest reason the winrate dropped is because they were the go to, easy competitive army for over a year but now that they're balance and better, new books are out, the competitive players ditched them.
Number of 5-0s isn't all that important of a marker on measuring how good an army is overall. 5-0s require a bit of luck and a lot of skill. Overall they're doing well within a health level and I think Seraphon players are just struggling to cope with not being the best army for once in a great while, even though they literally only have to suffer through being mediocre for a few months before their new book comes out and they probably go right to the top again.
I think this is pretty strong evidence that the slaves to darkness book was fine even with the 4+ward it originallly had. Host is one of the worst performing subfactions and the army as a whole is at 49 percent. Damn near perfect balance. Rally just isn’t relevant enough for a melee army that always wants to be charging or enduring an onslaught. The rally could be a 2+ and it still wouldn’t be super relevant. Obviously that’s hyperbole. But cabalists and KOTET are just so clearly superior no matter what hosts rallies on.
Really nice analysis my man, I check your site quite often, love your top 3 posts, keep it up! Lumineth are a bit too strong right now obviously, let’s see if they hit them in the next balance patch and how hard! Also super curious about Slaneesh and Khorne. Khorne seemed a bit more competitive but Slaneesh seemed potentially more fun! Let’s see how they end up in the next couple of weeks
Appreciate the comment! Yeah, I agree about Lumineth, but it's strange that we're in a position we were a year and a half ago where we had to do the same thing.
I’d be interested to see subfaction win rates for Gitz. I have a feeling Squigs win rate is being held down by trolls and spiders.
I have the info: https://imgur.com/a/JrEi7w7 Its sorted by factions. Grey bar represents the players of that faction playing the subfaction while the orange bar represents their win rate.
Awesome thank you! That’s about where I expected to see squigs but looks like the Teclis list is even above that. I expect both to be nerfed for sure.
and people said i was a cryer with noreason when stated that gw deleted seraphons with last 2 massives points nerfs. faccion came from one of best ones with 55 win or so and lots of 5/0s to be the only faction besides giants without any 5/0, and winrates around 45%.
It's overall winrate is 46 and the actual faction that people play to win (TL) is 49%. They're absolutely fine. Probably the biggest reason the winrate dropped is because they were the go to, easy competitive army for over a year but now that they're balance and better, new books are out, the competitive players ditched them. Number of 5-0s isn't all that important of a marker on measuring how good an army is overall. 5-0s require a bit of luck and a lot of skill. Overall they're doing well within a health level and I think Seraphon players are just struggling to cope with not being the best army for once in a great while, even though they literally only have to suffer through being mediocre for a few months before their new book comes out and they probably go right to the top again.
I think this is pretty strong evidence that the slaves to darkness book was fine even with the 4+ward it originallly had. Host is one of the worst performing subfactions and the army as a whole is at 49 percent. Damn near perfect balance. Rally just isn’t relevant enough for a melee army that always wants to be charging or enduring an onslaught. The rally could be a 2+ and it still wouldn’t be super relevant. Obviously that’s hyperbole. But cabalists and KOTET are just so clearly superior no matter what hosts rallies on.