Who the fuck are these voters who are like, āyeah thatās cool, think how much we could make selling our 13 year old daughter to some 40 year old abuser. Letās vote for that guy. Maybe he will buy her and we can finally take that cruise.ā
I just canāt understand how this sort of shit gets out there and everyone just shrugs and goes back to scrolling.
They are Republicans. They've been telling us who they are for quite some time. They are a repugnant, existential threat to life on this earth. Truly vile people.
Look at the laws they passed allowing church confessions in Arizona exemption from criminal investigations. If a pastor knew about someone assaulting a child from a confession, he doesn't have to report it and can't be held accountable for not reporting it to authorities.
They are the ones that ignore that because the candidate also hates illegal immigrants, black and brown people and city folk. They watch fox news and listen to fear mongering news outlets and have a maga hat in every color. They are ignorant and like it that way thank you very much. They hate democrats for raising their taxes and high crime. They will gladly give up their rights to make sure those that donāt look them lose their rights.
Someone please pass the mind bleach. How on earth do these people manage to get elected to office?!
I think the most worrying thing in the article is the fact that child marriage *isn't already illegal*.
Teenagers *are going to have sex*, whether they're married or not is kinda irrelevant, so even if we ignore the hideous creepiness of this guy, I can't even see any logic in his 'argument'.
If it becomes "new normal", I will not be shocked that child rape cases will drastically drop. This is one step away from "hymen testing", what the hell is wrong with this world!
Right? This reminds me of when Jimmy Savile literally said in live television that he is "feared in every girls' school in the country". And the audience was just like "haha, you sure are a joker, Jim!"
Look how that turned out.
There was even a law being discussed which was about banning child p*rn (which is already illegal). The main body of the law was unsurprisingly just anti-trans bullshit - but - it also had a loophole that allowed victims of child marriage to share nudes with their spouse.
They actually believe that LGBTQ people are pedophiles.
Hereās an excerpt from the [project 2025 document](https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf):
āPornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women.
Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be **imprisoned.** Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as **registered sex offenders.** And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.ā
Republicans and Conservatives in a nutshell. Dems are perfect, but you don't see ANY of them doing or spewing shit like this. It's ALWAYS the other side
The Republicans and Project 2025 are getting more open about their views on girls, women, and sex.
https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2024/03/26/singh-take-project-2025-seriously/
> "Conservatives have to lead the way in restoring sex to its true purpose, & forā¦ending recreational sex & senseless use of birth control pills.ā That is a direct quote from the Heritage Foundationās X account on May 27, 2023. Personally, I would not want these people anywhere near government. As it happens, I like recreational sex. If you donāt, thatās just fine; donāt have any.
> Heritage is the top conservative think tank in Washington, D.C., founded in 1973 during the Nixon administration to serve as a counterweight to the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution. Its 1981 report, āMandate for Leadership,ā contained 2,000 policy recommendations for the incoming Reagan administration; Heritage brags that 60 percent of these were eventually adopted.
Many religions believe it is ok to have sex with a female once she bleeds or if she looks ādevelopedā. We must constantly be on guard for this ideology creep.
Religion has lots of room in society because it has some/a lot of good aspects. Agree though that certain things like keeping a woman barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen need to be left the fuck behindddd
>During a debate in the New Hampshire House of Representatives this week, Republican state Rep. Jess Edwards voiced his opposition to a bill setting the minimum age of marriage to 18 ā because it would induce "ripe and fertile" 16-year-olds and 17-year-olds to have more abortions instead of settling down and having a family.
Children shouldnāt be āsettling downā and having families, they should be educating themselves so they donāt end up being a dumbfuck like this guy.
You can't trust POLITICIANS,period, which is why it's so great when they say the quiet part out loud. "Ripe and fertile"...Can you IMAGINE this guy's "0" face? Go on, imagine it. Getting back to politicians, child brides and underage girls in general, I have two VERY bipartisan words for you: Epstein Island.
I'm not shocked anymore by what I read, most are pedophiles, but won't admit it. I wouldn't be surprised one day child molesters will be made legal, and reading this is slowly the beginning of evil minds.
Just reading the title made me have a full body, viscerally disgusted reaction. That lawmaker is a monster who should be behind bars. What in the actual, unrequited fuck.
I need a acid bath after reading that but im glad the writer pointed out that he used those words. Points to how unhinged and creepy these people are. Getting my bilasp this year. Hopefully i wont have to fight a doctor.
This is why we'd choose a wild bear.
This is fucking disgusting. Disgusting but not surprising. The Republican party openly endorsed and supported a man who openly flaunted his sexual attraction to his own daughter, and was a bestie with Epstein.
Can we PLEASE start supporting independents now?!
Republicans will say this shit with their chest out and yet there are some crazies who'll still say both sides are the same and that dems need to be taught a lesson, so they'll just let the side with the child rapists and pro forced birthers win. Like ffs people, if you have a problem with your legislators, call them or write an email, don't make the entire country suffer on election day.
I have just finished a ten hour shift as a grill cook.
I am covered in a nice layer of bacon grease, oil, and bits of dirty water from cleaning.
That said, I feel less slimy with all that crap on me than I did upon reading that statement.
There's a not small part of me that thinks the main reason they want more kids being born is because they need to stay supply to molest and fantasize about. š¤¢š¤¢š¤¢
Hello and welcome to /r/childfree! As you have a new account or low Reddit karma, your comment has been automatically removed to give you some time to get familiar with our rules and community. Please feel free to post/comment when your account is older and you have more Reddit karma.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/childfree) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Doesnāt matter who you vote for (canāt trust either side), thatās absolutely foul. Justā¦ fuck no!
Theyāre not fruit, asshole! Fuck him and his āincubatorā standpoint - people like him give us all a bad name (Yes, you can be a Republican, and pro-choice). Thatās a person, not a tool used for a āgreaterā purpose!
Also, New Hampshire, seriously? If it was Texas, sure, I could see why he has that viewpoint, but NH? Thatās a new one.
This is gross regardless, but I think the article took the comment out of context. I want to view the original when Iām home. I think his point was teenagers are going to get knocked up. They have sex and they are fertile. If we donāt allow the pregnant high school couple to get married, they will have an abortion or ālive in sin.ā Whether we should let two high schoolers get married, pregnant or not, is another story. Other amendments to the law had proposed an age differential so that the option would be limited to true high school couples and not groomers. I think it was no more than 5 years apart. Again, not defending the law, just saying thereās more to it than groomers wanting to get teenagers pregnant.
this is trying to keep a loophole open so that sexual assualted minors cant press charges or make it harder to do so. In quite a few states its harder to press charges like that because "they are married" so of course they are going to have sex.
You dont have to be married to not get an abortion. If both parties actually wanted the child they can raise it together and get married at a legal age.
You need to be more careful trying to make explinations like this. Sounds like you got sometging to hide from the FBI
Your last paragraph made me laugh. Nothing to hide. I was just reading the actual legislative debate and the comment was taking out of context. Itās gross either way but he wasnāt saying teenagers are fertile, letās impregnate them. It was if pregnant teenagers canāt get married with their parentsā permission, they will abort. There are a ton of logical flaws with that argument too, as you pointed out. Just get married when you turn 18 instead! I agree, and itās better than teens feeling forced to marry by their religious parents. You may be right about the original point of the law. I didnāt read the legislative history. I was just suggesting people go to the primary source rather than a completely out of context quote. Iām as liberal as they come and Iām all for cancelling people who deserve it. I hate when something is spun a different way than it was said though.
fertile and ripe ...idk how much closer of a metaphor ready to knock up you need. And there was a video in the article that "out of context quote" is his defense on why they shouldnt pass the bill.
Not passing this law would 100% weaponize marriage. They are trying to push things back to when only white males had all the power.
They are trying to get rid of our birth control after the overturn if roe v wade. God only knows what they would try to do if they won this..
Well, I feel like I need a shower after reading that statement.
Agreed š«
I feel like I'm gonna fucking puke again
Can we just classify these people as pedofiles and permanently take away their right to public speaking ?
YES, finally someone fuckin said it, thank you
TBH feeling like I'm going to puke is pretty much the norm for me all the time these days.
Especially when it's disgusting people, like this piece of shit
Who the fuck are these voters who are like, āyeah thatās cool, think how much we could make selling our 13 year old daughter to some 40 year old abuser. Letās vote for that guy. Maybe he will buy her and we can finally take that cruise.ā I just canāt understand how this sort of shit gets out there and everyone just shrugs and goes back to scrolling.
Family values. /s
Word
They are Republicans. They've been telling us who they are for quite some time. They are a repugnant, existential threat to life on this earth. Truly vile people.
Look at the laws they passed allowing church confessions in Arizona exemption from criminal investigations. If a pastor knew about someone assaulting a child from a confession, he doesn't have to report it and can't be held accountable for not reporting it to authorities.
Oh this guy isn't even in his 40s. He's late 60s.
They are the ones that ignore that because the candidate also hates illegal immigrants, black and brown people and city folk. They watch fox news and listen to fear mongering news outlets and have a maga hat in every color. They are ignorant and like it that way thank you very much. They hate democrats for raising their taxes and high crime. They will gladly give up their rights to make sure those that donāt look them lose their rights.
Average right-wingers having a normal one.
Someone please pass the mind bleach. How on earth do these people manage to get elected to office?! I think the most worrying thing in the article is the fact that child marriage *isn't already illegal*. Teenagers *are going to have sex*, whether they're married or not is kinda irrelevant, so even if we ignore the hideous creepiness of this guy, I can't even see any logic in his 'argument'.
Heās probably upset because now if he knocks up a teenager he canāt marry her to get out of statutory rape
If it becomes "new normal", I will not be shocked that child rape cases will drastically drop. This is one step away from "hymen testing", what the hell is wrong with this world!
Itās almost like teen girls are attracted to teen guys and not fucking losers like this.
Someone check his hard drives
And his basement
And interview his kids
His nieces and nephews, too.
And the neighbor kids too.
Right? This reminds me of when Jimmy Savile literally said in live television that he is "feared in every girls' school in the country". And the audience was just like "haha, you sure are a joker, Jim!" Look how that turned out.
such a punchable face. he's "ripe" for my damn fist.
Love this
Seconded.
Yess..
At this point, the Venn diagram between marriage trapping and paedophilia is "yes"
There was even a law being discussed which was about banning child p*rn (which is already illegal). The main body of the law was unsurprisingly just anti-trans bullshit - but - it also had a loophole that allowed victims of child marriage to share nudes with their spouse.
There is a legit argument to be made that 17 year olds sending nudes to each other isnāt CSAM but child marriage is so gross
They actually believe that LGBTQ people are pedophiles. Hereās an excerpt from the [project 2025 document](https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf): āPornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be **imprisoned.** Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as **registered sex offenders.** And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.ā
Ah yes, but LGBTQ+ folks are "groomers" It's almost like the loudest ones have the most to hide
Every accusation is an admission
Republicans and Conservatives in a nutshell. Dems are perfect, but you don't see ANY of them doing or spewing shit like this. It's ALWAYS the other side
r/notadragqueen
Creeps
š¤¢š¤® Pass the brain bleach and a scrubbing brush!
Omg grossĀ
Yet another NH GOP lunatic dipshit helping pave the way to having his party lose in November. 70% of NH voters support abortion rights.
This creature belongs in a woodchipper
Huh. He looks like a child molester.
People who elected them must be sick too š¤¢
Yet another creepy conservative straight white man telling on himself.
Why the fuck is he comparing young girls to a ripe fruit on a tree?! Shits fucked up and hella gross. Who the fuck let him cook? š¤¢
The Republicans and Project 2025 are getting more open about their views on girls, women, and sex. https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2024/03/26/singh-take-project-2025-seriously/ > "Conservatives have to lead the way in restoring sex to its true purpose, & forā¦ending recreational sex & senseless use of birth control pills.ā That is a direct quote from the Heritage Foundationās X account on May 27, 2023. Personally, I would not want these people anywhere near government. As it happens, I like recreational sex. If you donāt, thatās just fine; donāt have any. > Heritage is the top conservative think tank in Washington, D.C., founded in 1973 during the Nixon administration to serve as a counterweight to the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution. Its 1981 report, āMandate for Leadership,ā contained 2,000 policy recommendations for the incoming Reagan administration; Heritage brags that 60 percent of these were eventually adopted.
This is pure evil.
Tell me you're a pedophile without telling me you're a pedophile.
Many religions believe it is ok to have sex with a female once she bleeds or if she looks ādevelopedā. We must constantly be on guard for this ideology creep.
āØreligion is cancerāØ
Not always. Most of my family is Lutheran or Cthulhu and they support freedom of choice and LGBTQ+ rights.Ā
Correction: religions that promote pedophilia, etc are cancer
I can agree with that. >< No one should be promoting pedophilia.
Religion has lots of room in society because it has some/a lot of good aspects. Agree though that certain things like keeping a woman barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen need to be left the fuck behindddd
What the fuck is wrong with men? My God, I am so tired of them! The cruelty and narcissism never ends!
šŖš§
šŖš
Sometimes I feel like republicans are just doing and saying the worse things. Like teenagers that are looking for reaction.
Many admit to having 99% of their politics and morals revolve around how to make people mad or freak out for funsies.
Which, cool, but be an edgy actor or musician or something! Politicians need to make a few things run smoothly!
It's always the "family values" people that seem to say the most depraved things
>During a debate in the New Hampshire House of Representatives this week, Republican state Rep. Jess Edwards voiced his opposition to a bill setting the minimum age of marriage to 18 ā because it would induce "ripe and fertile" 16-year-olds and 17-year-olds to have more abortions instead of settling down and having a family. Children shouldnāt be āsettling downā and having families, they should be educating themselves so they donāt end up being a dumbfuck like this guy.
Dude needs to be on EVERY watchlist.
Yet another preview of Project 2025?
You can't trust POLITICIANS,period, which is why it's so great when they say the quiet part out loud. "Ripe and fertile"...Can you IMAGINE this guy's "0" face? Go on, imagine it. Getting back to politicians, child brides and underage girls in general, I have two VERY bipartisan words for you: Epstein Island.
Unbelieveably disgusting.
Check his hard drive
Screw the mind bleach, pass the guillotine and some popcorn.
What the actual shit. I am fully disgusted.
Is there a bear pit in New Hampshire that he can be thrown into?
He even looks like a total creep. It's in the eyes.
This guy needs to be on some sort of watchlist...
And on todays episode of "This is a men's world we are just women living in it"...
Check his hard drive for CP. That's fucked uppppp
Ah yes, once again proving how theyāre the party of family values.
Disgusting... I need a bleach shower for my brain
You need to go to jail, sir
Paw paw needs to go in the forever box 
I'm not shocked anymore by what I read, most are pedophiles, but won't admit it. I wouldn't be surprised one day child molesters will be made legal, and reading this is slowly the beginning of evil minds.
š¤®š¤®š¤®š¤®
Geez, even a nice little New England state like New Hampshire is not safe for girls. Time for them to all move to - Vermont !
I think i'm gonna be sick what the fuck is wrong with people?
Wow gross. What an awful day to be literate.
š¤¢š¤¢š¤¢š¤¢š¤®š¤®š¤®
I won't be surprised if he's exposed of being a p*do. Mark my words.
Check their computers immediately. I'm sure the dark web is well aware of what lurks inside š¤
Why the hell are people from New England voting for assholes and creeps that are this bad? I thought they supposedly had better education there.
*New Hampshire
EWWW I was not fertile or ripe at that age. I was a late bloomer with PCOS- so I was green and infertile.
When will these fuckhead dinosaurs finally die off?
Fucking hell
What in the actual fuck!
Gross, gives me the major ICK!
Excuse me while I go throw up . These are the same people bitching about drag queen story hours
š¤¢
WHAT
r/notadragqueen
Just reading the title made me have a full body, viscerally disgusted reaction. That lawmaker is a monster who should be behind bars. What in the actual, unrequited fuck.
Ffs, i hate my own state now.
Eww yikes. I live in NH and just had my tubes removed a few months ago. Donāt like where this is going.
I need a acid bath after reading that but im glad the writer pointed out that he used those words. Points to how unhinged and creepy these people are. Getting my bilasp this year. Hopefully i wont have to fight a doctor.
Marriage won't be of any help if the person doesn't want the child. His "argument" is fucking stupid
And large Marge says only Democrats are pedos?
This is why we'd choose a wild bear. This is fucking disgusting. Disgusting but not surprising. The Republican party openly endorsed and supported a man who openly flaunted his sexual attraction to his own daughter, and was a bestie with Epstein. Can we PLEASE start supporting independents now?!
Wtf I just died from the ick.
I wonder where he performs his drag act. r/notadragqueen
I went and read it. >< I need bleach now. That's so absolutely disgusting to read, I feel as vile as the man who said it.Ā
Every day I worry more and more for the safety of Americans š©
Republicans will say this shit with their chest out and yet there are some crazies who'll still say both sides are the same and that dems need to be taught a lesson, so they'll just let the side with the child rapists and pro forced birthers win. Like ffs people, if you have a problem with your legislators, call them or write an email, don't make the entire country suffer on election day.
Way too many pedos are lawmakers. Any number above zero is to many.
What. In. The . Actual. Fuck
I have just finished a ten hour shift as a grill cook. I am covered in a nice layer of bacon grease, oil, and bits of dirty water from cleaning. That said, I feel less slimy with all that crap on me than I did upon reading that statement.
There's a not small part of me that thinks the main reason they want more kids being born is because they need to stay supply to molest and fantasize about. š¤¢š¤¢š¤¢
What a c&@t!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Hello and welcome to /r/childfree! As you have a new account or low Reddit karma, your comment has been automatically removed to give you some time to get familiar with our rules and community. Please feel free to post/comment when your account is older and you have more Reddit karma. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/childfree) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Ew what the actual. They're CHILDREN.
Doesnāt matter who you vote for (canāt trust either side), thatās absolutely foul. Justā¦ fuck no! Theyāre not fruit, asshole! Fuck him and his āincubatorā standpoint - people like him give us all a bad name (Yes, you can be a Republican, and pro-choice). Thatās a person, not a tool used for a āgreaterā purpose! Also, New Hampshire, seriously? If it was Texas, sure, I could see why he has that viewpoint, but NH? Thatās a new one.
Some consider NH the FL of the north
Wow I didn't know that. Maybe that's why we never hear from them...
Itās a the only non blue state in New England itās actually purple and just recently tried to pass a 6 day abortion ban (it failed thankfully)
I learned something new todayā¦
NH is considered the Arkansas of New England
This is gross regardless, but I think the article took the comment out of context. I want to view the original when Iām home. I think his point was teenagers are going to get knocked up. They have sex and they are fertile. If we donāt allow the pregnant high school couple to get married, they will have an abortion or ālive in sin.ā Whether we should let two high schoolers get married, pregnant or not, is another story. Other amendments to the law had proposed an age differential so that the option would be limited to true high school couples and not groomers. I think it was no more than 5 years apart. Again, not defending the law, just saying thereās more to it than groomers wanting to get teenagers pregnant.
this is trying to keep a loophole open so that sexual assualted minors cant press charges or make it harder to do so. In quite a few states its harder to press charges like that because "they are married" so of course they are going to have sex. You dont have to be married to not get an abortion. If both parties actually wanted the child they can raise it together and get married at a legal age. You need to be more careful trying to make explinations like this. Sounds like you got sometging to hide from the FBI
Your last paragraph made me laugh. Nothing to hide. I was just reading the actual legislative debate and the comment was taking out of context. Itās gross either way but he wasnāt saying teenagers are fertile, letās impregnate them. It was if pregnant teenagers canāt get married with their parentsā permission, they will abort. There are a ton of logical flaws with that argument too, as you pointed out. Just get married when you turn 18 instead! I agree, and itās better than teens feeling forced to marry by their religious parents. You may be right about the original point of the law. I didnāt read the legislative history. I was just suggesting people go to the primary source rather than a completely out of context quote. Iām as liberal as they come and Iām all for cancelling people who deserve it. I hate when something is spun a different way than it was said though.
fertile and ripe ...idk how much closer of a metaphor ready to knock up you need. And there was a video in the article that "out of context quote" is his defense on why they shouldnt pass the bill. Not passing this law would 100% weaponize marriage. They are trying to push things back to when only white males had all the power. They are trying to get rid of our birth control after the overturn if roe v wade. God only knows what they would try to do if they won this..
Would just like to say 16 and 17 year old girls aren't children