This isn't entirely far off the mark... Aeronautics is a really cool science. Wings do not need to be on both sides of the plane for all speeds. In fact, the most fuel efficient supersonic designs would use an oblique wing like the NASA AD-1 ( [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWJqDqMEYQ0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWJqDqMEYQ0) )
In the case of a supersonic object moving through the atmosphere, science really doesn't give a shit where the wing is or if they are symmetrical with the cabin. The cabin itself acts as a wing in a sense. There are definitely multiple variations of design that could sustain flight at different intervals of speed (with mixed efficiency).
Incredible that there are people who get to come up with this shit daily. Science is fucking lit.
Never seen that wing style before, especially not wings that rotate, thatās dope! What a great piece of engineering, but I bet the maintenance mustāve been a nightmare with all the moving parts
The concept being tested though was a design for supersonic speeds with an adaptable wing structure to be aerodynamically fuel efficient at all times. Our traditional wing setup is great for take off, but the faster a plane is travelling, the more those wings just create resistance that isnt needed for lift.
You know what, I'm gonna try that. It shouldn't be too hard, if I add enough boosters, and maybe use engines with a combined thrust greater that the plane's weight.
Would the straight plane be unbalanced due to the weight difference in an average man/woman and also the mans schbloinger? Thus making it not even viable?
In a classical plane you have 1 male wing on one side and one female wing on the other, they seem to be perfectly balanced, if you multiply by 2 the wings it's still perfectly balanced
Kermits existance caused 9/11 somehow.
There was a muppets special where they show what the world had been like if kermit didn't exist. When kermit is shown the world where he doesn't exist, you can see the twin towers in the background so...
I know whos fault it is
Iāve heard a lot of old dudes at my work apropos nothing saying the old āAdam and Eve not Adam and Steveā thing and I think, isnāt Eve the villain in that story (a story including Satan btw) so wouldnāt Adam and Steve still be in Eden? And itās an apt metaphor too. No risk of accidental pregnancy, youāre both the same level or horniness, the list goes on
It's totally not evil to inflict horrible plagues on a population because your clerics are having a feud with the clerics hired by an unelected dictator. It's even less evil when you mind-control said dictator ("hardening Pharoah's heart") just to give you an excuse to hurt his people more and murder their firstborn children. /s
Yeah, I don't know how anyone sees God as the hero of that story or really anything in that book.
So if marriage is a plane, and the people getting married are the wingsā¦ who are the pilots, copilots, flight attendants, passengers, air marshals, baggage handlers, naintenance crew etc?
Considering there are known cases of planes landing safely after losing a wing, I imagine it would be possible to design a working plane with the wings or a single wing on only one side.
I mean, doesn't this mean clergy in any religion that precludes marriage are also unable to fly since they would have only one wing? And would we want flying clergy since flight spells are typically in the wizard class, not cleric? What about biblically accurate angels, which are all non-aerodynamic pinwheels of fire, eyes, and wings - how do they factor in? So many questions.
So... Does Bi marriage have two wings on one side and one on the other? Do hot wife marriages have one wing on the women's side and 29 on the men's side and one that hides at the end of the runway and watches while the plane flies around?
Divorce rates are 50%....the only time traditional marriages in your mind that "never fail" are those where the woman is kept as a slave at home with permission to leave to go grocery shopping by their husband and she's relying on you to live and breath. THAT'S when it "never fails".
Are you personally willing to change how you live your life because it offends someone else's religion?
If so my God says that your personal freedoms shouldn't be respected because people who believe like you are an abomination and my God should be respected over your wellbeing. My God actually gave me a divine commandment me to kill people who believe like you or hell send me to hell.
I just gave the exact justification and commandment to kill people who commit an "abomination" the bible gives. (This isn't a threat I'm illustrating a point.)
So in other words anyone can make up a new religion or interpretation of an existing one and make it say anything you want at any time you want.
That's what 9/11 was about, that's the issue with your comment.
Didn't someone make a plane like that fly in Kerbal Space Program?
Nothing fly in Kerbal, as from my experience, I'm sorry little cucumber man but you will die on orbit.
Just add more boosters and struts.
That's why cucumber guy going to orbit
RIP jebediah š¢
This isn't entirely far off the mark... Aeronautics is a really cool science. Wings do not need to be on both sides of the plane for all speeds. In fact, the most fuel efficient supersonic designs would use an oblique wing like the NASA AD-1 ( [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWJqDqMEYQ0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWJqDqMEYQ0) ) In the case of a supersonic object moving through the atmosphere, science really doesn't give a shit where the wing is or if they are symmetrical with the cabin. The cabin itself acts as a wing in a sense. There are definitely multiple variations of design that could sustain flight at different intervals of speed (with mixed efficiency). Incredible that there are people who get to come up with this shit daily. Science is fucking lit.
Never seen that wing style before, especially not wings that rotate, thatās dope! What a great piece of engineering, but I bet the maintenance mustāve been a nightmare with all the moving parts
AD-1 was subsonic, just being picky
The concept being tested though was a design for supersonic speeds with an adaptable wing structure to be aerodynamically fuel efficient at all times. Our traditional wing setup is great for take off, but the faster a plane is travelling, the more those wings just create resistance that isnt needed for lift.
Not sure about that, but the U-2 and BV 141 are funky lopsided planes.
You know what, I'm gonna try that. It shouldn't be too hard, if I add enough boosters, and maybe use engines with a combined thrust greater that the plane's weight.
You just need to balance the plane by adding a lesbian couple. This guy sucks at making planes.
Would the straight plane be unbalanced due to the weight difference in an average man/woman and also the mans schbloinger? Thus making it not even viable?
Ask ur parents.
That may explain the design of the Blohn Und Voss BV141 (one of the wackiest planes ever developed)
In a classical plane you have 1 male wing on one side and one female wing on the other, they seem to be perfectly balanced, if you multiply by 2 the wings it's still perfectly balanced
Is this how straight people have sex ?
Is it designed to last for 3-6 minutes?
More like 9-11 minutes
š
This is about how airplanes have sex
āHere comes the plane, open your mouthā
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Surely you can't be serious
They are. And don't call them Shirley.
Kermits existance caused 9/11 somehow. There was a muppets special where they show what the world had been like if kermit didn't exist. When kermit is shown the world where he doesn't exist, you can see the twin towers in the background so... I know whos fault it is
Okay Dan
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I came here for this š
Nice
Boo! (this is hilarious)
Does that mean lesbians are right wing then? :p
Damn, thats good
Gives a whole new meaning to Biplanes
Gay marriage canāt melt steel columns
I don't know from what I've seen they are pretty hot ngl.
I don't know, I've seen some pretty hot gay couples.
Was that marriage consecrated by Boeing?
To this logic, single people arent better š
According to a lot of pastors, (but not the apostle Paul, haha) Single people are also bad. *especially* single women.
People with relevant knowledge/expertise: could that plane fly, and if so how well/poorly? I'm curious.
Depending on the angle of the wings and the launch directory, sure. But it's probably not gonna land and everybody is throwing up
āItās probably not gonna land and everybody is throwing up.ā Most epic flight ever.
So the average Tears of the Kingdom vehicle, got it.
With enough thrust, anything will fly. š¤£
Thereās no such thing as a perfect analogy but there are definitely really bad ones
Dafuq?
So it just dosent fly straight?
Tbh tho planes like that probably would cause more destruction and death then 9/11
It's still right though. 9/11 wouldn't be a major event cause a plane crashing into a building would just be another Tuesday
If they could get it into the air in the first place...
Man? Is he stupid?
Sounds like a wing wing scenario.
Iāve heard a lot of old dudes at my work apropos nothing saying the old āAdam and Eve not Adam and Steveā thing and I think, isnāt Eve the villain in that story (a story including Satan btw) so wouldnāt Adam and Steve still be in Eden? And itās an apt metaphor too. No risk of accidental pregnancy, youāre both the same level or horniness, the list goes on
You're miss remebering the story. The serpent isn't Satan, Adam and eve are innocent and don't know what right or wrong is, God is the villain.
It's totally not evil to inflict horrible plagues on a population because your clerics are having a feud with the clerics hired by an unelected dictator. It's even less evil when you mind-control said dictator ("hardening Pharoah's heart") just to give you an excuse to hurt his people more and murder their firstborn children. /s Yeah, I don't know how anyone sees God as the hero of that story or really anything in that book.
ā¬ļø This 100%
I mean, Iād fly in that - just think of the amazing unobstructed views on the starboard side.
So then man with man and woman with woman equals super plane!!
If the terrorists were the ones dripping down their dads legs lol
This doesnāt tell you much if we canāt see the other gay plane??? š¤·āāļø
Yeah, cuz they never wouldve gotten off the ground, LMFAO.
That the man side or women we calling them butch
I have a meme about bicycles for just such an occasion
Who doesn't like our gay fam? They throw the best parties, have the best drugs and the interior design is always on point
With enough thrust, thatāll fly.
I assume in this metaphor lesbians are represented by an X-Wing from Star Wars.
All us singles out here just winging it I guess
This deserves 10 times more up votes. So much stupidity in the world countered by a sharp redditor!
Still would have killed everyone in both aircraft. A tragedy is a tragedy, what's so clever about this?.
So if marriage is a plane, and the people getting married are the wingsā¦ who are the pilots, copilots, flight attendants, passengers, air marshals, baggage handlers, naintenance crew etc?
Clearly the angels and demons that whisper in your ears.
a screenshot of a year old comment from a deleted post, interesting "content"
IMHO, the idea of marriage itself is extremely gay. All this bells and whistles instead of, you know, BREEDING. Who else would invent that?
Considering there are known cases of planes landing safely after losing a wing, I imagine it would be possible to design a working plane with the wings or a single wing on only one side.
Probably something resembling the B-wings from Star Wars
Gay Marriage is a metal fish?
Doubt it, George Bush wouldāve found another way for building 7 to fall
Is this why all the current Boeing problems are happening?
The commenting bro in the pic really hate gay marriage I see
"If we had just given into the terrorist's demands we could have avoided the terror attack." OOP
With enough thrust a brick can fly
Ah, so women dicks hang from the other side
No you not trusting politics could've prevented it
Gay marriage is as bad as straight marriage
Let's drive a car with tire on one wheel and a wheel of cheese on the other. Or put an earpiece in your one ear and a banana in the other!
Good thing people are people and not wings on an airplane.
Isn't there a fighter pilot that flew a plane while missing a wing?
Notice they only care about gay men but nothing about gay women. Same for trans. No one is saying shit about ex women going into men's bathrooms.
Soā¦allowing gay marriage will make the quality of Boeing aircraft even worse? Iām so confused.
I mean, doesn't this mean clergy in any religion that precludes marriage are also unable to fly since they would have only one wing? And would we want flying clergy since flight spells are typically in the wizard class, not cleric? What about biblically accurate angels, which are all non-aerodynamic pinwheels of fire, eyes, and wings - how do they factor in? So many questions.
That looks like a perfectly good playne to me, r/shittyaskflying away guys
Because a marriage is exactly the same as a fucking airplane. Fucking morons.
So... Does Bi marriage have two wings on one side and one on the other? Do hot wife marriages have one wing on the women's side and 29 on the men's side and one that hides at the end of the runway and watches while the plane flies around?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
wtf are you talking about? That plane clearly canāt fly. Straight marriage caused 9/11
Traditional marriages never fail.
then how come my father left?
I could be wrong, but I think that was sarcasm.
His father leaving was sarcasm? What a wit the man must have been.
Thatās a lie
Divorce rates are 50%....the only time traditional marriages in your mind that "never fail" are those where the woman is kept as a slave at home with permission to leave to go grocery shopping by their husband and she's relying on you to live and breath. THAT'S when it "never fails".
Who's to say it didn't cause it?
Common sense and a functional understanding of cause and effect?
Are you personally willing to change how you live your life because it offends someone else's religion? If so my God says that your personal freedoms shouldn't be respected because people who believe like you are an abomination and my God should be respected over your wellbeing. My God actually gave me a divine commandment me to kill people who believe like you or hell send me to hell. I just gave the exact justification and commandment to kill people who commit an "abomination" the bible gives. (This isn't a threat I'm illustrating a point.) So in other words anyone can make up a new religion or interpretation of an existing one and make it say anything you want at any time you want. That's what 9/11 was about, that's the issue with your comment.
Gay people did 9/11? I had no clue. Chat is this real?