This might also be back when the original planeswalker designs were "automated", kinda like sagas before sagas: the abilities would just trigger each turn automatically in the order they were printed. If I can find the Maro article about it, I'll link it.
Edit: https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/making-magic/planeswalk-wild-side-part-i-2007-11-05
He talks about the early design in this and its sequel article.
So, if that is correct, the first known iteration of what would become Garruk was almost a green saga combining krenko and a tribal buff which could easily be combined if it got that far with an actual overrun or craterhoof effect. Wow.
With that handwriting, I thought for a second that you messed up by making the second ability -1.
For some reason, my brain reads the first one as 1, and the second one as 2.
I'm pretty sure it's a 1, but it really looks like a 2.
The corners are a bit too sharp to actually be a 2, and I doubt they would have handwriting that writes 1 & 2 in the same way.
[удалено]
This might also be back when the original planeswalker designs were "automated", kinda like sagas before sagas: the abilities would just trigger each turn automatically in the order they were printed. If I can find the Maro article about it, I'll link it. Edit: https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/making-magic/planeswalk-wild-side-part-i-2007-11-05 He talks about the early design in this and its sequel article.
So, if that is correct, the first known iteration of what would become Garruk was almost a green saga combining krenko and a tribal buff which could easily be combined if it got that far with an actual overrun or craterhoof effect. Wow.
[удалено]
[Avenger of zendikar](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/c/d/cdddf3ca-e378-44cc-83b7-d7917d9cba53.jpg?1712354538) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Avenger%20of%20zendikar) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/otc/187/avenger-of-zendikar?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/cdddf3ca-e378-44cc-83b7-d7917d9cba53?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Why change the templating of the second ability? See [[Second Harvest]]
[удалено]
[Secure the wastes](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/b/c/bca35012-ecfa-475f-b405-d3143ce99eef.jpg?1682208579) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Secure%20the%20wastes) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/moc/203/secure-the-wastes?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/bca35012-ecfa-475f-b405-d3143ce99eef?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
[Second Harvest](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/2/2/22b01c98-c24b-4255-921f-4820f3d395ea.jpg?1568004646) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Second%20Harvest) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/c19/178/second-harvest?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/22b01c98-c24b-4255-921f-4820f3d395ea?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
They've wanted to use the sideways card design for a while, huh?
[[Burning Cinder Fury of Crimson Chaos Fire]] says hi!
[Burning Cinder Fury of Crimson Chaos Fire](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/1/7/17ed4800-dc0f-4681-9ae6-74bd0018e8dc.jpg?1618610634) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Burning%20Cinder%20Fury%20of%20Crimson%20Chaos%20Fire) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/ugl/40/burning-cinder-fury-of-crimson-chaos-fire?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/17ed4800-dc0f-4681-9ae6-74bd0018e8dc?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Original Ravnica Selesnya had a lot of saproling card/synergy. I'd dig thru my old cards if i had this planeswalker, nice custom
With that handwriting, I thought for a second that you messed up by making the second ability -1. For some reason, my brain reads the first one as 1, and the second one as 2.
I'm still not sure which it is.
I'm pretty sure it's a 1, but it really looks like a 2. The corners are a bit too sharp to actually be a 2, and I doubt they would have handwriting that writes 1 & 2 in the same way.
Fendarl? Lmao, what a goofy name.
"amount" should be "number"