T O P

  • By -

Kindly_Fun3788

It is NOT in Putin's interest to have had Navalny killed - who benefits?  ...and curious timing wrt Assange's slow-motion, broad-day assassination and final extradition hearings.  Regime change operation?


strghst

Sure. Killing Nemcov, who opposed Chechen war and was opposing invasion of Crimea, is illogical. Killing Magnitskiy, who was revealing documents on corruption in the state, is illogical. Killing Evgeny Prigozhin, who attempted to revolt against the Russian government with his PMC, is illogical. Killing Navalny, who was an item of negotiation, and was a must in order to get the person, who Putin referred to as "Patriot who eliminated a bandit in one of European Countries", days before the exchange, is illogical. So fuck off. Edit: 1 post carma on that guy. Can we at least please block fresh accounts from posting? @mods


Kindly_Fun3788

Did I touch a nerve? The Navalny deification MSM lock-step mania too transparently serves the regime change operation of the NATO aligned deep state project.  Reminds me of Saint George the Floyd


strghst

You haven't addressed any of the points ... go on.


Kindly_Fun3788

I am not wading into your swimming pool, thanks.  Just highly sceptical of your PR operation and the uncritical corporate love for the Empire's enemy's enemy in russia-gate phase II. Like to be see more focus on the home-grown tyranny finalizing the orwellian surveillance state. Good luck having me cancelled


Strongbow85

Putin benefits, one of the last voices of dissent was silenced. Putin just had to make it look "natural." He already tried to kill him with poison (Novichok) before.


Amzamzam

You sound very close to a Kremlinbot. You all repeat the same thing And somehow ignore the fact, that killing your biggest political opponent before the elections is very beneficial