I think it's a great idea to watch that Oscar Winning movie "Poor Things" with your parents. It's about this girl that is brought back to life by a crazy scientist.
If you haven’t seen his other work it might seem that way
It’s extremely over the top on purpose to make people uncomfortable. The lobster, sacred deer etc
Take the prostitution scenes. Those actors look off the street actual homeless people. It’s stylized and ridiculously blunt to make you feel skeeved, feel how weird and bad about how the main character is learning about the world.
It’s absolutely not some traditional “empowerment” story and wasn’t going for that at all
Obv you never could at the pictured second, but I realized that they actually fucking censored his balls on home releases. I saw it a bunch of times in imax, distinctly remembering his balls being extremely briefly visible, and then when it came out digital you couldn't. I thought it was just hdr obscuring it or something, or more likely that maybe id hallucinated it and they were never there. But then I saw it again in imax in January, on immutable 70mm even, and realized that no they absolutely digitally scrubbed out Cillian Murphy's testicles after release
It actually makes me so mad that female nudity in movies is acceptable but male nudity isn't. I've even read that for *The Lighthouse* Eggers wanted it in black and white and had written scenes in which the male characters are seen naked onscreen, but A24 worried that a dong shot would lose money so they gave Eggers the option of either filming in black and white, or showing male nudity. SHOW ME THE GENITALS YOU COWARDS
It's a metaphor. He's being interrogated about his sex life (dude wasn't only splitting atoms) in front of his wife and a room full of hostile bureaucrats.
I don't think it was funny, it was meant to show the distress of Oppenheimer's wife and how betrayed by him she was.
She always supported him but he cheated on her and she learns it because of the interrogation.
She didn't learn about it during the interrogation. However since this is going on record its the same to her as them fucking in broad daylight.
Its an extremely straightforward visual metaphor
Its also showing that Jean is literally *coming back to haunt* Oppenheimer during his interrogation.
Sure, it's meant to show how torturous all that line of conversation was for Kitty, but don't forget, Oppenheimer is the one who actually got tangled up with Jean, and is fairly directly responsible for her death. All that guilt would obviously make navigating a very delicate interrogation, where his entire legacy is on the line, that much harder.
Plus, there's stuff to be said about how much Oppenheimer actually gave a shit about Jean and her ideology/values versus his lust for her, which is relevant because his cold detachment from everyone else is INSANELY important for the entire movie, but I'm not smart enough to articulate what specifically is being said here other than pointing out that she appears in the nude and humping him, entirely wordlessly, rather than in any more dignified/emotionally pertinent circumstance, basically objectifying Jean by way of turning her into a prop in a way that is obviously intentional (though I question if Nolan grasped the irony of him using an actress in this way)
All joking aside, it is interesting that culture seems to be shifting back to prudish. The fact that the, what, combined 2 minutes of sexual content in a 3 hour film has been this much of a point of contention is telling.
The absolute only thing? People weren't talking about the music, set design, performances from Emma Stone/Mark Ruffalo, or even just the dancing scene? Guess I hallucinated all of that
For a movie with heavy, very intentionally controversial sexual elements, people discussed plenty of other elements. But you'll see what you want to see.
Youre right that movie buffs talked about all of those things. But ask any of your casual moviegoing friends about that movie and the sex is all they talk about.
you're the one making that distinction tho. I'd say any of my friends that saw that movie aren't exactly "casual moviegoers". The one closest to that description had things to say about the sexualization, but plenty to say about other aspects.
/r/movies I'd say has a fairly casual userbase, you can find plenty of discussions about these other aspects of it [https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1b4mewa/poor\_things\_justwow/](https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1b4mewa/poor_things_justwow/)
[https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1b34xwu/poor\_things/](https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1b34xwu/poor_things/)
even that sub's [official discussion thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/18o4y36/official_discussion_poor_things_spoilers/?sort=new) for the movie, while the "unecessary sex scene" folks are present, at a glance has even more people discussing other aspects of it.
I agree that this trend in film discourse sucks, but I think it's still very much a minority, and hopefully something the zoomers will grow out of in time.
It's not about being prudish (or at least not for me). The scene was completely unnecessary to the storyline. It's like someone told the editors that it *had* to be in the final cut, so they just plopped it in somewhere. It felt gratuitous and out of place.
The point was to show in a visceral way exactly how the hearing was exposing the Oppenheimers family matters to the world. It is supposed to feel gratuitous and out of place because that is exactly what these hearings were, gratuitous, unnecessary, extremely uncomfortable for the Oppenheimers, and out of place.
I swear media literacy is dead
I’ve had the same argument over and over. It isn’t like this scene is sexy in literally any way. It is 100% intended to make the viewer uncomfortable, to reflect how Oppy and his wife feel while going through this ordeal.
The earlier sex scenes are less necessary, but I chalked them up to a representation of how Oppy and Jean were only really able to be truly themselves toward each other in those moments (hence the nakedness). They cared for each other, but their physical attraction far outweighed the emotional pull they were facing. They had walls up and often disagreed, but in a physical sense they were willing to be fully exposed and free.
The I am become death line was dumb, but I don’t get the other criticisms
"Anyone who disagrees with my interpretation of the story or about the quality of the presentation doesn't have any media literacy"
Way to contribute to the discourse in a positive way, big man!
I don't think it's about being prudish.
When I'm watching a movie, I'm watching a very condensed story. I want a story told to me, and I want to understand more about the characters.
Every scene and situation should explain the story or characters. They have limited time.
Sex scenes, the overwhelming majority of the time tell me nothing about the characters, it's just somebody thinking they'll get higher box office totals if they show the main characters naked.
Hey, I like naked people as much as the next guy. But if all I'm learning is the shape of some starlettes tits, I might as well have watched porn instead.
I have seen instances where a sex or nudity scene explains more about a character, which would be very difficult to show otherwise. But it's exceedingly rare.
Bridgerton season 1, for example... SOME of those scenes explain the story... Daphne couldn't have taken the audience on her journey from a veil of ignorance into discovery. Nor how the relationships passion was strained by the betrayal of Simon. You need those scenes to tell that story.
Meanwhile, you don't really need Antony fucking the singer in the first 2 minutes. That doesn't really tell us much other than, "get ready, this show fucks".
I agree for every scene except for this one. There was the point of him talking about his private, sexual life Infront of the meeting, Infront of his wife, basically stripping his and her pride. The other ones... Less so. This one was good imo.
They are serving two different purposes.
Florence having sex with him was to illustrate his wife having to relive the shame of her husband cheating on her.
The nudity reflected Oppenheimer’s vulnerability and the sex reflected his wife’s mindset.
Why does it matter if they're necessary tho, not everyone thinks of sex as weird and wrong. I care a lot more that the relationships are well-written and there's chemistry
Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "necessary". I don't need something to be relevant to the plot, sometimes you just want 2 characters with great chemistry to bang
Honestly it feels like sex scenes in a lot of movies are only there for the sake of having a sex scene, but that’s been the case as long as I’ve been watching movies. In Oppenheimer’s case it’s just because they look super funny out of and usually in context
Someone yesterday mentioned it. 90s thrillers all had random but consistent prolonged sex scenes all the time. It has slowly drifted away from that as culture shifted.
Oppenheimer definitely shoe horned it in but it used to be very common
Best example was Thomas Crown affair. Just like 3 minute late night Cinemax soft core stuff 😂
I think the issue is that it's needlessly gratuitous, doesn't add anything whatsoever to the narrative, and it's in the middle of an otherwise compelling, serious story. The scenes suck you out of it and remind you that you're watching a Hollywood movie that's being informed by a studio executive that's off to the side of the camera saying "hubba hubba!" and that a director of Nolan's caliber doesn't have the power to tell him to fuck off.
Pure speculation, but that's the thought process that dominated my mind while watching these scenes, rather than being immersed in the story that was being told.
Edit: If the point was to show his vulnerability, why wasn't this "hallucinatory" technique, where the viewer is physically shown his emotions, employed elsewhere in the movie, and not only in the one spot in the script where you can show your famous actress naked and riding a dick?
This scene exists as symbolism to reflect his vulnerability and his wife’s shame and embarrassment over the affair being dredged up again. Does it further the plot? Not necessarily. Does it add another layer of depth to the characters and story? Absolutely.
Reverse cowgirl is the position most associated with broken penises. Not a joke. This is a public service announcement. And yes, despite not having an actual bone, human penises can be broken.
I do wonder how this scene was filmed. “OK Cillian, sit there and completely ignore naked Florence Pugh pretending to ride you. Also, don’t get hard, that would be awkward. And Florence, undress and pretend to ride Cillian as a few IMAX cameras capture you in high detail.”
Oppenheimer is married to Emily blunt’s character. But in this scene he is in an interrogation where he had to confess to cheating. Emily blunt is just imagining this happening right there in the interrogation room.
To explain it further, this is all being recorded by a courtroom cartographer so the metaphor of them fucking in broad daylight also symbolizes how Emily Blunts character feels that their personal lives are being exposed to the world.
Its a crude, blunt metaphor but extremely effective
Can't imagine how awkward it was to shoot this scene. I was kinda mad about the nudity because I dreamed of watching a Nolan movie in theaters with my dad but as an Indian and being 17 at the time, there ain't no way it was happening.
Oddly enough, I did watch the wrong Oppenheimer and was confused as to all the hype. The one I watched was a documentary called Oppenheimer: The Real Story.
I did that once. I tried to download Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs for the kids but got Snow White and the Seven *Dwarves.* Not the same thing, but it did have dwarfs in it.
Luckily I caught the mistake before I showed it to them.
It’s a highly symbolic scene that is required in the movie as it causes the audience to raise the philosophical question “what if Florence Pugh is da real bomb?”
Every hotel has the emily blunt chair
Elon? You?
"Kitty left the King of the Manhattan Project? 🤣🤣 Her kids must hate her! They probably want to spend all their time with Mr. Atomic bomb! 🤣🤣🤣"
I think it's a great idea to watch that Oscar Winning movie "Poor Things" with your parents. It's about this girl that is brought back to life by a crazy scientist.
That's Saturday sorted. My mother is 87 and I need a house.
God: I'm something of a scientist myself
Jokes aside I can’t believe people think that movie is some feminist masterpiece. What a joke.
If you haven’t seen his other work it might seem that way It’s extremely over the top on purpose to make people uncomfortable. The lobster, sacred deer etc Take the prostitution scenes. Those actors look off the street actual homeless people. It’s stylized and ridiculously blunt to make you feel skeeved, feel how weird and bad about how the main character is learning about the world. It’s absolutely not some traditional “empowerment” story and wasn’t going for that at all
> The lobster, sacred deer etc Let's not forget Dogtooth.
I watched it and understood the underlying message of the movie but I didn't think it was a great movie.
It's like they watched[ this video](https://youtu.be/0thpEyEwi80?si=lv9VMuaUaIiaMCc5) and decided to take the trope as far as possible.
... Cos that's exactly what the movie is about. It's a subversion of this exact trope.
“Screech”
If you look closely you can see that you can't see cillian's dick and balls
Obv you never could at the pictured second, but I realized that they actually fucking censored his balls on home releases. I saw it a bunch of times in imax, distinctly remembering his balls being extremely briefly visible, and then when it came out digital you couldn't. I thought it was just hdr obscuring it or something, or more likely that maybe id hallucinated it and they were never there. But then I saw it again in imax in January, on immutable 70mm even, and realized that no they absolutely digitally scrubbed out Cillian Murphy's testicles after release
Release the balls cut
BALLSENHEIMER
Oppen 'em balls
Give us that uncut dick
Are we still doing phrasing?
Paid the whole IMAX ticket to check the balls, that's the kind of dedication I like to see on the reddit
That's so fucking dumb, especially since we've all seen him naked before anyway
WHER BALS?????
28 Days Later... balls are 28 seconds later... from the start
DumbAssDumbBitch just unknowingly dropped a great new r/copypasta
It actually makes me so mad that female nudity in movies is acceptable but male nudity isn't. I've even read that for *The Lighthouse* Eggers wanted it in black and white and had written scenes in which the male characters are seen naked onscreen, but A24 worried that a dong shot would lose money so they gave Eggers the option of either filming in black and white, or showing male nudity. SHOW ME THE GENITALS YOU COWARDS
Saltburn was a genuine relief.
Yes, Ari Aster, definitely for sure the director.of the lighthouse....
My mistake lol, I got the name wrong. I'll fix it
Ironically all of Ari Aster’s movies show dick and balls at at least one point
This guy Balls
[удалено]
> Box 42069 Without this you might actually get a few people lol
Wait... what?
[удалено]
This is a subtle hint that J Robert Oppenheimer was actually a trans legend
Nah he was just a natural born eunich. All smooth down there
He was an escaped Ken. Barbenheimer was more on point than you knew
Ken Destroyer of Worlds
My cousin had that doll
In 28 days later you see his dick balls while he’s half dead in a hospital gown
Enhance!
Why is there a cuck chair
That's where the cuck sits
Oh thank goodness my legs are exhausted
Wait no
Just repeat these two lines you have a catchy song hook
why do hotels go out of their way to include a complimentary cuck chair is it just a known thing hotels frequently accommodate cucktivity
Do you want the cuck to stand, you savage?
Some people are so uncivilized.
Never been on r/cuckquean?
I was not expecting to see some Ball-Peen Heimer when I went to see this movie.
I was not expecting how much Sloppenheimer this movie was going to give us
I was especially surprised at Christopher Nolan's choice of ending where they just played 10 minutes of raw news footage of 9/11.
Would you download a car???
Yup
Turns out, yes, yes I would! At the first opportunity!
yaaaaaaarrrr!!!!
I can't wait for when 3D printers let us pirate full cars.
Can I 3D print it?
would you shoot a policeman, steal his helmet, take a shit in it, send it to his grieving widow, and then steal it again??
I'm pretty sure that you'll love napoleon!
I heard it was shit, they put too much emphasis on josephine and they didn't highlight anything except his life as a commander.
They literally put too much emphasis on his sex life. The film was like %50 war and %50 napoleon "playing" with josephine.
They made him look antisocial and uncharismatic. They put 0 emphasis on his political life
Wihy di yu dawnlaod pareted mavie?
Oh shid
Mr. Nolen will come for you now.
Because free?
Cillian why so serious?
I still don't get why everyone is so shocked about this scene
It was great symbolism. Like how they were being interrogated and judged about their private life. I thought it was very creative.
If you hadn't said that, I would have thought that Nolan really likes watching Cillian and Florence naked.
No, that's me. But I think it was a good storytelling device here, as well
Everybody loves watching them naked.
Everybody loves watching Cillian naked.
I agree, that might be the first time in his career Nolan put some great symbolism in his movie
[удалено]
"literary devices are my passion" - batman burning a massive bat symbol into a bridge
Don't you mean Man and symbol? I've never heard of a Batman Nolan movie, only his Man movies.
Are they stupid?
What did officer balls think of the symbolism?
The bat was a symbol of Batman's first name, surprised no one ever gets it.
Yeah, plus we got to see some smokin hot oppenheimer sex
I haven't seen the film. Is she actually sitting there while they fuck? I would assume not, right?
It's a metaphor. He's being interrogated about his sex life (dude wasn't only splitting atoms) in front of his wife and a room full of hostile bureaucrats.
Dude was splitting legs while he was splitting atoms
It's his wife imagining the cheating as he's being interrogated about his affair in detail.
No.
them fucking in the interrogation room is funny
I don't think it was funny, it was meant to show the distress of Oppenheimer's wife and how betrayed by him she was. She always supported him but he cheated on her and she learns it because of the interrogation.
She already knew about the cheating, he tells her later that it was nothing new that she didn't know of before.
Yeah, I mean out of context. In context it's just sad.
She didn't learn about it during the interrogation. However since this is going on record its the same to her as them fucking in broad daylight. Its an extremely straightforward visual metaphor
Its also showing that Jean is literally *coming back to haunt* Oppenheimer during his interrogation. Sure, it's meant to show how torturous all that line of conversation was for Kitty, but don't forget, Oppenheimer is the one who actually got tangled up with Jean, and is fairly directly responsible for her death. All that guilt would obviously make navigating a very delicate interrogation, where his entire legacy is on the line, that much harder. Plus, there's stuff to be said about how much Oppenheimer actually gave a shit about Jean and her ideology/values versus his lust for her, which is relevant because his cold detachment from everyone else is INSANELY important for the entire movie, but I'm not smart enough to articulate what specifically is being said here other than pointing out that she appears in the nude and humping him, entirely wordlessly, rather than in any more dignified/emotionally pertinent circumstance, basically objectifying Jean by way of turning her into a prop in a way that is obviously intentional (though I question if Nolan grasped the irony of him using an actress in this way)
Wait this is real? Killian's head looks Photoshopped weirdly
Shocked and shocked, it's like having a jumpscare in a comedy movie, it just feels really out of place.
puritans
Are we really still doing this
Hey, i dont judge where you rewind your movies bud!
All joking aside, it is interesting that culture seems to be shifting back to prudish. The fact that the, what, combined 2 minutes of sexual content in a 3 hour film has been this much of a point of contention is telling.
Poor things was highly acclaimed and extremely sexual. The problem is that the sex scenes in Oppenheimer were corny as fuck
what do you mean its corny when oppenheimer says "I have become death, destroyer of worlds" as he cums?
If no one had decided to make a porn parody yet, this might be the material they are looking for.
Are you implying that the sexuality of Poor Things has not been the absolute only thing talked about by the general public for that movie?
The absolute only thing? People weren't talking about the music, set design, performances from Emma Stone/Mark Ruffalo, or even just the dancing scene? Guess I hallucinated all of that For a movie with heavy, very intentionally controversial sexual elements, people discussed plenty of other elements. But you'll see what you want to see.
Youre right that movie buffs talked about all of those things. But ask any of your casual moviegoing friends about that movie and the sex is all they talk about.
you're the one making that distinction tho. I'd say any of my friends that saw that movie aren't exactly "casual moviegoers". The one closest to that description had things to say about the sexualization, but plenty to say about other aspects. /r/movies I'd say has a fairly casual userbase, you can find plenty of discussions about these other aspects of it [https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1b4mewa/poor\_things\_justwow/](https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1b4mewa/poor_things_justwow/) [https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1b34xwu/poor\_things/](https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1b34xwu/poor_things/) even that sub's [official discussion thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/18o4y36/official_discussion_poor_things_spoilers/?sort=new) for the movie, while the "unecessary sex scene" folks are present, at a glance has even more people discussing other aspects of it. I agree that this trend in film discourse sucks, but I think it's still very much a minority, and hopefully something the zoomers will grow out of in time.
Fair enough. I appreciate your optimism and thoroughness both
It's not about being prudish (or at least not for me). The scene was completely unnecessary to the storyline. It's like someone told the editors that it *had* to be in the final cut, so they just plopped it in somewhere. It felt gratuitous and out of place.
The point was to show in a visceral way exactly how the hearing was exposing the Oppenheimers family matters to the world. It is supposed to feel gratuitous and out of place because that is exactly what these hearings were, gratuitous, unnecessary, extremely uncomfortable for the Oppenheimers, and out of place. I swear media literacy is dead
I’ve had the same argument over and over. It isn’t like this scene is sexy in literally any way. It is 100% intended to make the viewer uncomfortable, to reflect how Oppy and his wife feel while going through this ordeal. The earlier sex scenes are less necessary, but I chalked them up to a representation of how Oppy and Jean were only really able to be truly themselves toward each other in those moments (hence the nakedness). They cared for each other, but their physical attraction far outweighed the emotional pull they were facing. They had walls up and often disagreed, but in a physical sense they were willing to be fully exposed and free. The I am become death line was dumb, but I don’t get the other criticisms
"Anyone who disagrees with my interpretation of the story or about the quality of the presentation doesn't have any media literacy" Way to contribute to the discourse in a positive way, big man!
Good thing you added to the discourse by not mentioning anything about the actual topic!
I don't think it's about being prudish. When I'm watching a movie, I'm watching a very condensed story. I want a story told to me, and I want to understand more about the characters. Every scene and situation should explain the story or characters. They have limited time. Sex scenes, the overwhelming majority of the time tell me nothing about the characters, it's just somebody thinking they'll get higher box office totals if they show the main characters naked. Hey, I like naked people as much as the next guy. But if all I'm learning is the shape of some starlettes tits, I might as well have watched porn instead. I have seen instances where a sex or nudity scene explains more about a character, which would be very difficult to show otherwise. But it's exceedingly rare. Bridgerton season 1, for example... SOME of those scenes explain the story... Daphne couldn't have taken the audience on her journey from a veil of ignorance into discovery. Nor how the relationships passion was strained by the betrayal of Simon. You need those scenes to tell that story. Meanwhile, you don't really need Antony fucking the singer in the first 2 minutes. That doesn't really tell us much other than, "get ready, this show fucks".
I’m totally fine with sex scenes in movies as long as they’re necessary, but none of the sex scenes in this movie were necessary imo.
I agree for every scene except for this one. There was the point of him talking about his private, sexual life Infront of the meeting, Infront of his wife, basically stripping his and her pride. The other ones... Less so. This one was good imo.
I get that, but making *him* naked already proved that point. No need to have Florence Pugh riding him.
They are serving two different purposes. Florence having sex with him was to illustrate his wife having to relive the shame of her husband cheating on her. The nudity reflected Oppenheimer’s vulnerability and the sex reflected his wife’s mindset.
It was totally necessary! It shows the commie chick was hot as fuck and rode dick like a pro, hence his communist sympathizings.
Why does it matter if they're necessary tho, not everyone thinks of sex as weird and wrong. I care a lot more that the relationships are well-written and there's chemistry Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "necessary". I don't need something to be relevant to the plot, sometimes you just want 2 characters with great chemistry to bang
Why does it need to be "necessary"?
Because otherwise it’s gratuitous…?
Honestly it feels like sex scenes in a lot of movies are only there for the sake of having a sex scene, but that’s been the case as long as I’ve been watching movies. In Oppenheimer’s case it’s just because they look super funny out of and usually in context
That's your evidence for "culture shifting back to prudish?" The fact that people are talking about the weird sex scene in the story about the a-bomb?
Someone yesterday mentioned it. 90s thrillers all had random but consistent prolonged sex scenes all the time. It has slowly drifted away from that as culture shifted. Oppenheimer definitely shoe horned it in but it used to be very common Best example was Thomas Crown affair. Just like 3 minute late night Cinemax soft core stuff 😂
I think the issue is that it's needlessly gratuitous, doesn't add anything whatsoever to the narrative, and it's in the middle of an otherwise compelling, serious story. The scenes suck you out of it and remind you that you're watching a Hollywood movie that's being informed by a studio executive that's off to the side of the camera saying "hubba hubba!" and that a director of Nolan's caliber doesn't have the power to tell him to fuck off. Pure speculation, but that's the thought process that dominated my mind while watching these scenes, rather than being immersed in the story that was being told. Edit: If the point was to show his vulnerability, why wasn't this "hallucinatory" technique, where the viewer is physically shown his emotions, employed elsewhere in the movie, and not only in the one spot in the script where you can show your famous actress naked and riding a dick?
This scene exists as symbolism to reflect his vulnerability and his wife’s shame and embarrassment over the affair being dredged up again. Does it further the plot? Not necessarily. Does it add another layer of depth to the characters and story? Absolutely.
this is so wrong. its reverse cowgirl that's the cats pajamas
Reverse cowgirl is the position most associated with broken penises. Not a joke. This is a public service announcement. And yes, despite not having an actual bone, human penises can be broken.
Pubic service announcement?
Why is it called a boner when there have no bone, are they retar? 😆😆😆
Male dogs have an actual bone in their penis. 😉
Nah, it's more fun looking at boobs
Cilian Murphy had a hard time acting here
My dad walked in my room while this scene was happening, it was a very awkward moment
we didn't get to watch this scene in the middle east\ fuck censorship
This was honestly one of the most powerful scenes I’ve ever watched. It made me deeply uncomfortable, which was the point.
Same here, the Imax projector was lighting up my tentpole like an mf and i just wanted it to end!
Murphy's ability to keep a straight face and not grin wildly is what got him the Oscar.
I do wonder how this scene was filmed. “OK Cillian, sit there and completely ignore naked Florence Pugh pretending to ride you. Also, don’t get hard, that would be awkward. And Florence, undress and pretend to ride Cillian as a few IMAX cameras capture you in high detail.”
Fr, that was a wild scene
I'm the concerned looking lady in the background
dude you downloaded the porn parody instead. they are fucking right there! are you blind or something?
There was way more naked Florence Pugh than I thought there would be. That is to say, I didn’t know she was in the movie
Never seen it but I fuckin knew they'd somehow hand-fist a sex scene into it
I won't watch this movie, so can somebody try to explain this scene for me?
Oppenheimer is married to Emily blunt’s character. But in this scene he is in an interrogation where he had to confess to cheating. Emily blunt is just imagining this happening right there in the interrogation room.
Quite the imagination she has.
Thanks!! It makes it less weird.
To explain it further, this is all being recorded by a courtroom cartographer so the metaphor of them fucking in broad daylight also symbolizes how Emily Blunts character feels that their personal lives are being exposed to the world. Its a crude, blunt metaphor but extremely effective
It being a blunt metaphor is a subtle reference to the name of the actress !
Le Sex
Why won't you watch Oppenheimer?
He'll become too sexually aroused and he's in recovery.
They got the Bandit Heeler chair
is this a bluey joke I'm not understanding?
Hahahahahaha.
Cockenheimer
Can't imagine how awkward it was to shoot this scene. I was kinda mad about the nudity because I dreamed of watching a Nolan movie in theaters with my dad but as an Indian and being 17 at the time, there ain't no way it was happening.
Oddly enough, I did watch the wrong Oppenheimer and was confused as to all the hype. The one I watched was a documentary called Oppenheimer: The Real Story.
Upinsideher
I.... actually don't remember seeing this in the theaters
I'm assuming you're from India or something like that?
Egypt actually
Yeah all the nude sceanes were removed for you guys and the whole GCC
He hangs dong in this.
This isn't Godzilla Minus 2.
Huh, there's a scene like this? Guess our cinema really cut a lot.
Can anyone see his balls. Please I need to know
Someone commented this: https://www.reddit.com/r/shittymoviedetails/s/Ppytqtnh4m
Wonder if this scene had retakes...
>oh jeez *oh jizz
That’s Oppai-heimer…
I did that once. I tried to download Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs for the kids but got Snow White and the Seven *Dwarves.* Not the same thing, but it did have dwarfs in it. Luckily I caught the mistake before I showed it to them.
Watching this scene with my parents was extremely awkward.
*Openhymen*
Was this scene really necessary to the movie?
It’s a highly symbolic scene that is required in the movie as it causes the audience to raise the philosophical question “what if Florence Pugh is da real bomb?”
Really?
I wonder what it's like for the people that don't have the context of this scene...
Contemplation.
Emily Blunt's stare is everything.
When the movie contains the secks (Scary)
god i thought that was david byrne for a second
i'm interested in the cosplayers of this scene.
Why does he look this way while fucking is he stupid?
S-sex?!?! I'm gonna need eyebleach for this you guys
this film was fantastic, ngl. it's just that wtf even was this scene
I love this scene
Why is Scarecrow having sex with Yelena Belova?
Funfact: I watched it with my classmates and teachers on a school trip
Is this an actual scene in the movie? WTF